Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSGPX vs RMDFX
GSGPX vs RMDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGPX vs. RMDFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGPX is a Hold and RMDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSGPX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. RMDFX (1.06B). RMDFX pays higher dividends than GSGPX: RMDFX (4.47) vs GSGPX (0.48). GSGPX was incepted earlier than RMDFX: GSGPX (8 years) vs RMDFX (10 years). RMDFX (5.23) is less costly to investors than GSGPX (0.82). GSGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 179.00 vs. RMDFX (5.00). GSGPX (0) and RMDFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.48 vs. GSGPX (6.37). RMDFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.63 vs. GSGPX (15.40).
| GSGPX | RMDFX | GSGPX / RMDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 5.15 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 5.23 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.401 | 4.461 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.74B | 1.06B | 540% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 4.47 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 21.48 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.28 | 39.61 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.40 | 36.63 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement