Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFTX vs RMEBX
GSFTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSFTX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Income Inst
Price$36.56
Change+$0.20 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.05B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
GSFTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFTX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. GSFTX (45.1B). GSFTX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: GSFTX (1.60) vs RMEBX (1.05). GSFTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSFTX (28 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GSFTX (0.65). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GSFTX (16.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSFTX: RMEBX (250) vs GSFTX (2000). GSFTX (4.86) and RMEBX (4.81) have marching annual gain over last year. GSFTX return over 5 years is better than : 64.55 vs. RMEBX (55.95).
| GSFTX | RMEBX | GSFTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.243 | 13.527 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.1B | 111B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.05 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.86 | 4.81 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.88 | 38.19 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.55 | 55.95 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.29 | 89.36 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers