Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFPX vs SLESX
GSFPX vs SLESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. SLESX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a Hold and SLESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.68B vs. SLESX (204M). SLESX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: SLESX (6.13) vs GSFPX (1.13). GSFPX was incepted earlier than SLESX: GSFPX (8 years) vs SLESX (9 years). SLESX (0.80) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). SLESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. GSFPX (23.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLESX: GSFPX (0) vs SLESX (1000000). SLESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.56 vs. GSFPX (6.09). SLESX return over 5 years is better than : 57.05 vs. GSFPX (41.31).
| GSFPX | SLESX | GSFPX / SLESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.78 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.80 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.296 | 13.823 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.68B | 204M | 1,805% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 6.13 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.09 | 13.56 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.29 | 63.30 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.31 | 57.05 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers