Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFPX vs SLESX
GSFPX vs SLESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. SLESX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a Buy and SLESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.72B vs. SLESX (209M). SLESX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: SLESX (6.11) vs GSFPX (1.10). GSFPX was incepted earlier than SLESX: GSFPX (8 years) vs SLESX (9 years). SLESX (0.80) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). SLESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. GSFPX (23.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLESX: GSFPX (0) vs SLESX (1000000). SLESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. GSFPX (9.53). SLESX return over 5 years is better than : 52.62 vs. GSFPX (37.99).
| GSFPX | SLESX | GSFPX / SLESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.78 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.80 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.826 | 0.899 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.72B | 209M | 1,779% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 6.11 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.53 | 18.62 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.32 | 58.01 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.99 | 52.62 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers