Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFPX vs SCCUX
GSFPX vs SCCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. SCCUX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a Hold and SCCUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.73B vs. SCCUX (209M). SCCUX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: SCCUX (5.07) vs GSFPX (1.10). GSFPX was incepted earlier than SCCUX: GSFPX (8 years) vs SCCUX (20 years). SCCUX (1.90) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). SCCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. GSFPX (23.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCCUX: GSFPX (0) vs SCCUX (1000). SCCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.85 vs. GSFPX (6.80). SCCUX return over 5 years is better than : 47.60 vs. GSFPX (39.52).
| GSFPX | SCCUX | GSFPX / SCCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.88 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.90 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.751 | 15.025 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.73B | 209M | 1,786% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 5.07 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.80 | 12.85 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.55 | 56.59 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.52 | 47.60 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers