Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFPX vs SCCUX
GSFPX vs SCCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. SCCUX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a Buy and SCCUX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.74B vs. SCCUX (209M). SCCUX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: SCCUX (5.14) vs GSFPX (1.09). GSFPX was incepted earlier than SCCUX: GSFPX (8 years) vs SCCUX (20 years). SCCUX (1.88) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). SCCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. GSFPX (23.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCCUX: GSFPX (0) vs SCCUX (1000). SCCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.73 vs. GSFPX (7.90). SCCUX return over 5 years is better than : 42.92 vs. GSFPX (35.25).
| GSFPX | SCCUX | GSFPX / SCCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.86 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.88 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.322 | 0.989 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.74B | 209M | 1,788% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 5.14 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.90 | 12.73 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.69 | 50.55 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.25 | 42.92 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers