Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFPX vs SCAYX
GSFPX vs SCAYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. SCAYX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a Buy and SCAYX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.62B vs. SCAYX (199M). SCAYX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: SCAYX (6.30) vs GSFPX (1.17). GSFPX was incepted earlier than SCAYX: GSFPX (7 years) vs SCAYX (17 years). SCAYX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). SCAYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. GSFPX (23.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCAYX: GSFPX (0) vs SCAYX (1000). SCAYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.67 vs. GSFPX (8.67). SCAYX return over 5 years is better than : 51.03 vs. GSFPX (42.43).
| GSFPX | SCAYX | GSFPX / SCAYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.88 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.90 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.460 | 9.908 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.62B | 199M | 1,821% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 6.30 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.67 | 15.67 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.94 | 43.08 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.43 | 51.03 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers