Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFPX vs SCAUX
GSFPX vs SCAUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. SCAUX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a Hold and SCAUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.68B vs. SCAUX (202M). SCAUX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: SCAUX (5.83) vs GSFPX (1.13). GSFPX was incepted earlier than SCAUX: GSFPX (8 years) vs SCAUX (20 years). SCAUX (1.15) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). SCAUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. GSFPX (23.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCAUX: GSFPX (0) vs SCAUX (1000). SCAUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.17 vs. GSFPX (6.09). SCAUX return over 5 years is better than : 53.16 vs. GSFPX (41.31).
| GSFPX | SCAUX | GSFPX / SCAUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.13 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.15 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.296 | 12.094 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.68B | 202M | 1,823% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 5.83 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.09 | 12.17 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.29 | 61.12 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.31 | 53.16 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement