Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFP vs PCGG
GSFP vs PCGG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFP vs. PCGG commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFP is a Hold and PCGG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCGG has more net assets: 186M vs. GSFP (10.8M). GSFP has a higher annual dividend yield than PCGG: GSFP (10.378) vs PCGG (3.314). GSFP was incepted earlier than PCGG: GSFP (4 years) vs PCGG (2 years). GSFP (0.75) has a lower expense ratio than PCGG (0.85). GSFP has a higher turnover PCGG (17.61) vs PCGG (17.61).
| GSFP | PCGG | GSFP / PCGG | |
| Gain YTD | 10.378 | 3.314 | 313% |
| Net Assets | 10.8M | 186M | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.85 | 88% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 17.61 | 187% |
| Yield | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GSFP | PCGG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 84% | 16 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GSFP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSFP has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSFP jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSFP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSFP | 100% | N/A | ||
| ACM - GSFP | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| VLTO - GSFP | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| ETN - GSFP | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| BLD - GSFP | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| WMS - GSFP | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
More | ||||
PCGG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PCGG and V have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCGG and V's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCGG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCGG | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| V - PCGG | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
| ABT - PCGG | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.91% | ||
| ACN - PCGG | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| ZTS - PCGG | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.69% | ||
| MA - PCGG | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||