GSFD
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
75.29K
HERB
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
34.33M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSFD vs HERB

Header iconGSFD vs HERB Comparison
Open Charts GSFD vs HERBBanner chart's image
Global Seafood Technologies
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$275
Capitalization75.29K
YaSheng Group
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization34.33M
GSFD vs HERB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HERB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSFD vs. HERB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFD is a Hold and HERB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GSFD: $0.12 vs. HERB: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: GSFD and HERB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSFD: 5% vs. HERB: 2%
Market capitalization -- GSFD: $75.29K vs. HERB: $34.33M
GSFD [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $75.29K. HERB’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $34.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSFD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHERB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GSFD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HERB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GSFD and HERB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSFD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HERB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSFD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HERB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSFD is a better buy in the short-term than HERB.

Price Growth

GSFD (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а +3.48% price change this week, while HERB (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -22.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (-0.02% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HERB($34.3M) has a higher market cap than GSFD($75.3K). GSFD YTD gains are higher at: 20.966 vs. HERB (-64.773).
GSFDHERBGSFD / HERB
Capitalization75.3K34.3M0%
EBITDAN/A127M-
Gain YTD20.966-64.773-32%
P/E RatioN/A0.08-
RevenueN/A939M-
Total CashN/A1.4M-
Total DebtN/A45.7M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSFD vs HERB: Fundamental Ratings
GSFD
HERB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10065
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5690
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSFD's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as HERB (62). This means that GSFD’s stock grew similarly to HERB’s over the last 12 months.

GSFD's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HERB (100). This means that GSFD’s stock grew similarly to HERB’s over the last 12 months.

HERB's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSFD (100). This means that HERB’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSFD’s over the last 12 months.

GSFD's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HERB (90). This means that GSFD’s stock grew somewhat faster than HERB’s over the last 12 months.

GSFD's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HERB (100). This means that GSFD’s stock grew similarly to HERB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSFDHERB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HERB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IREN16.821.16
+7.41%
IREN Limited
OPAL2.670.09
+3.49%
OPAL Fuels
UCB31.790.39
+1.24%
United Community Banks Inc
CCL29.960.31
+1.05%
Carnival Corp
TURB2.38N/A
N/A
Turbo Energy SA

GSFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSFD and DTCK have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSFD and DTCK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSFD
1D Price
Change %
GSFD100%
N/A
DTCK - GSFD
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
GARPY - GSFD
9%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%
HERB - GSFD
4%
Poorly correlated
-11.43%
GRCLF - GSFD
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
CTUNF - GSFD
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HERB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HERB and GSFD have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HERB and GSFD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HERB
1D Price
Change %
HERB100%
-11.43%
GSFD - HERB
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTUNF - HERB
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRGSF - HERB
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARPF - HERB
-7%
Poorly correlated
-16.92%
GRCLF - HERB
-8%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
More