GSFD
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.6M
HERB
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
5.34M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSFD vs HERB

Header iconGSFD vs HERB Comparison
Open Charts GSFD vs HERBBanner chart's image
Global Seafood Technologies
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$108
Capitalization1.6M
YaSheng Group
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.34M
GSFD vs HERB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HERB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSFD vs. HERB commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFD is a Hold and HERB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (GSFD: $0.09 vs. HERB: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: GSFD and HERB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSFD: 4% vs. HERB: 1%
Market capitalization -- GSFD: $1.6M vs. HERB: $5.34M
GSFD [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $1.6M. HERB’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $5.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSFD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHERB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GSFD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HERB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HERB is a better buy in the long-term than GSFD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSFD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HERB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSFD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HERB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSFD is a better buy in the short-term than HERB.

Price Growth

GSFD (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а -6.59% price change this week, while HERB (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -2.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+2.13% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HERB($5.34M) has a higher market cap than GSFD($1.6M). GSFD YTD gains are higher at: -13.596 vs. HERB (-61.364).
GSFDHERBGSFD / HERB
Capitalization1.6M5.34M30%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.596-61.36422%
P/E RatioN/A0.08-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSFD vs HERB: Fundamental Ratings
GSFD
HERB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10071
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSFD's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as HERB (58). This means that GSFD’s stock grew similarly to HERB’s over the last 12 months.

GSFD's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HERB (100). This means that GSFD’s stock grew similarly to HERB’s over the last 12 months.

HERB's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as GSFD (100). This means that HERB’s stock grew similarly to GSFD’s over the last 12 months.

HERB's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSFD (90). This means that HERB’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSFD’s over the last 12 months.

HERB's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GSFD (100). This means that HERB’s stock grew similarly to GSFD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSFDHERB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HERB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AS38.710.79
+2.08%
Amer Sports
CDNA11.840.02
+0.17%
CareDx
FNWD29.610.02
+0.07%
Finward Bancorp
AGYS105.83-0.33
-0.31%
Agilysys
QH0.11N/A
-0.97%
Quhuo Limited

GSFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSFD and DTCK have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSFD and DTCK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSFD
1D Price
Change %
GSFD100%
N/A
DTCK - GSFD
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
GARPY - GSFD
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HERB - GSFD
4%
Poorly correlated
+13.33%
GRCLF - GSFD
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTUNF - GSFD
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HERB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HERB and GSFD have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HERB and GSFD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HERB
1D Price
Change %
HERB100%
+13.33%
GSFD - HERB
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTUNF - HERB
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRGSF - HERB
1%
Poorly correlated
-7.02%
GARPF - HERB
-7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRCLF - HERB
-8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More