GSEFF
Price
$55.40
Change
-$3.90 (-6.58%)
Updated
Feb 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.85B
KMMPF
Price
$14.21
Change
-$0.10 (-0.70%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.62B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSEFF vs KMMPF

Header iconGSEFF vs KMMPF Comparison
Open Charts GSEFF vs KMMPFBanner chart's image
Convivio
Price$55.40
Change-$3.90 (-6.58%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.85B
Killiam Apt Real Estate Invt Tr
Price$14.21
Change-$0.10 (-0.70%)
Volume$9.98K
Capitalization1.62B
GSEFF vs KMMPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KMMPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSEFF vs. KMMPF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSEFF is a Hold and KMMPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GSEFF: $55.40 vs. KMMPF: $14.21)
Brand notoriety: GSEFF and KMMPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSEFF: 100% vs. KMMPF: 45%
Market capitalization -- GSEFF: $4.85B vs. KMMPF: $1.62B
GSEFF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $4.85B. KMMPF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSEFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKMMPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GSEFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KMMPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMMPF is a better buy in the long-term than GSEFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KMMPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KMMPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

GSEFF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KMMPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.40% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSEFF($4.85B) has a higher market cap than KMMPF($1.62B). KMMPF has higher P/E ratio than GSEFF: KMMPF (8.27) vs GSEFF (6.47). KMMPF YTD gains are higher at: 20.988 vs. GSEFF (-6.577). GSEFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.49B vs. KMMPF (366M). GSEFF has more cash in the bank: 462M vs. KMMPF (14.1M). KMMPF has less debt than GSEFF: KMMPF (2.19B) vs GSEFF (11.3B). GSEFF has higher revenues than KMMPF: GSEFF (906M) vs KMMPF (348M).
GSEFFKMMPFGSEFF / KMMPF
Capitalization4.85B1.62B300%
EBITDA1.49B366M408%
Gain YTD-6.57720.988-31%
P/E Ratio6.478.2778%
Revenue906M348M260%
Total Cash462M14.1M3,277%
Total Debt11.3B2.19B517%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSEFF vs KMMPF: Fundamental Ratings
GSEFF
KMMPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9775
SMR RATING
1..100
9441
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6593
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMMPF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as GSEFF (66). This means that KMMPF’s stock grew similarly to GSEFF’s over the last 12 months.

KMMPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as GSEFF (97). This means that KMMPF’s stock grew similarly to GSEFF’s over the last 12 months.

KMMPF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSEFF (94). This means that KMMPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSEFF’s over the last 12 months.

KMMPF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as GSEFF (59). This means that KMMPF’s stock grew similarly to GSEFF’s over the last 12 months.

GSEFF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as KMMPF (93). This means that GSEFF’s stock grew similarly to KMMPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSEFFKMMPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KMMPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMLF69.820.51
+0.74%
iShares U.S. Small-Cap Eq Fac ETF
AAPX20.450.15
+0.74%
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF
FLMB22.980.02
+0.09%
Franklin Municipal Green Bond ETF
IDOG34.28-0.23
-0.67%
ALPS International Sector Div Dogs ETF
CSPF25.56-0.20
-0.78%
Cohen & Steers Pref & Inc Oppos Act ETF

GSEFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSEFF and CTO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSEFF and CTO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSEFF
1D Price
Change %
GSEFF100%
N/A
CTO - GSEFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
IMQCF - GSEFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GECFF - GSEFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KMMPF - GSEFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPTGF - GSEFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KMMPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KMMPF and AGNC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMMPF and AGNC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMMPF
1D Price
Change %
KMMPF100%
N/A
AGNC - KMMPF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
KLPEF - KMMPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYLOF - KMMPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
INVH - KMMPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
MAA - KMMPF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
More