Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCZX vs NAESX
GSCZX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GSCZX vs NAESX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$17.80
Change-$0.46 (-2.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets816.88M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$119.91
Change-$2.72 (-2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
GSCZX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCZX vs. NAESX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCZX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. GSCZX (817M). NAESX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: NAESX (1.22) vs GSCZX (0.20). GSCZX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GSCZX (24 years) vs NAESX (65 years). GSCZX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). GSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: GSCZX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. GSCZX (-8.67). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 48.22 vs. GSCZX (7.49).
| GSCZX | NAESX | GSCZX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.17 | 724% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.17 | 724% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.793 | 6.726 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 817M | 162B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.22 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.67 | 1.42 | -609% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.42 | 33.14 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.49 | 48.22 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.35 | 137.58 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement