Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCZX vs NAESX
GSCZX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GSCZX vs NAESX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$18.00
Change-$0.04 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets819.16M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$121.31
Change-$0.03 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
GSCZX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCZX vs. NAESX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCZX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. GSCZX (819M). NAESX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: NAESX (1.23) vs GSCZX (0.20). GSCZX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GSCZX (24 years) vs NAESX (65 years). GSCZX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). GSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: GSCZX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.92 vs. GSCZX (-4.16). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 55.28 vs. GSCZX (17.05).
| GSCZX | NAESX | GSCZX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.17 | 724% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.17 | 724% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.925 | 5.577 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 819M | 162B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.23 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.16 | 4.92 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.40 | 41.91 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.05 | 55.28 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.99 | 130.16 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement