Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCZX vs NAESX
GSCZX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GSCZX vs NAESX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$17.52
Change+$0.10 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets863.8M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$118.17
Change+$0.72 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
GSCZX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCZX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCZX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. GSCZX (864M). NAESX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: NAESX (1.28) vs GSCZX (0.21). GSCZX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GSCZX (24 years) vs NAESX (65 years). GSCZX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). GSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: GSCZX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. GSCZX (-3.54). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.66 vs. GSCZX (22.89).
| GSCZX | NAESX | GSCZX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.17 | 724% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.17 | 724% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.793 | 2.781 | -29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 864M | 153B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 1.28 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.54 | 8.46 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.87 | 34.15 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.89 | 66.66 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.63 | 114.71 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement