Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCZX vs NAESX
GSCZX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GSCZX vs NAESX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$18.36
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets914.61M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.59
Change+$0.15 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
GSCZX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCZX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCZX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. GSCZX (915M). NAESX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: NAESX (1.20) vs GSCZX (0.20). GSCZX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GSCZX (24 years) vs NAESX (65 years). GSCZX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). GSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: GSCZX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.62 vs. GSCZX (4.24). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.60 vs. GSCZX (24.41).
| GSCZX | NAESX | GSCZX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.17 | 724% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.17 | 724% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.794 | 6.494 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 915M | 161B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.20 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.24 | 13.62 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.73 | 39.23 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.41 | 66.60 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.65 | 132.36 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement