Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCLX vs RGACX
GSCLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GSCLX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts Svc
Price$32.20
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.56B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
GSCLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCLX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCLX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. GSCLX (1.56B). RGACX pays higher dividends than GSCLX: RGACX (0.07) vs GSCLX (0.00). GSCLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GSCLX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). GSCLX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). GSCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). GSCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GSCLX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. GSCLX (9.60). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. GSCLX (-16.19).
| GSCLX | RGACX | GSCLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.94 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.94 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.524 | 15.516 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.60 | 17.83 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.63 | 58.53 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.19 | 40.02 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.96 | 95.93 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement