Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCLX vs RGACX
GSCLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GSCLX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts Svc
Price$33.91
Change+$0.10 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.64B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.71
Change+$0.36 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
GSCLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCLX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCLX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. GSCLX (1.64B). RGACX pays higher dividends than GSCLX: RGACX (0.07) vs GSCLX (0.00). GSCLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GSCLX (29 years) vs RGACX (24 years). GSCLX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). GSCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). GSCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GSCLX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.46 vs. GSCLX (2.15). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 29.83 vs. GSCLX (-16.76).
| GSCLX | RGACX | GSCLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.94 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.94 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.000 | 18.558 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.64B | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.15 | 6.46 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.80 | 60.09 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.76 | 29.83 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.29 | 89.90 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement