Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCLX vs RGACX
GSCLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GSCLX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts Svc
Price$34.15
Change-$0.06 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.93
Change-$0.02 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.52B
GSCLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCLX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCLX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. GSCLX (1.65B). RGACX pays higher dividends than GSCLX: RGACX (0.07) vs GSCLX (0.00). GSCLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GSCLX (29 years) vs RGACX (24 years). GSCLX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). GSCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). GSCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GSCLX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. GSCLX (3.58). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. GSCLX (-13.54).
| GSCLX | RGACX | GSCLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.94 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.94 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.156 | 19.364 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.58 | 8.31 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.13 | 63.31 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.54 | 37.90 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.91 | 98.36 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement