GSCCF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.02 (+28.57%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
223.53M
SRGXF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
37.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSCCF vs SRGXF

Header iconGSCCF vs SRGXF Comparison
Open Charts GSCCF vs SRGXFBanner chart's image
Ioneer
Price$0.09
Change+$0.02 (+28.57%)
Volume$39.23K
Capitalization223.53M
Surge Copper
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$223.5K
Capitalization37.02M
GSCCF vs SRGXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRGXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSCCF vs. SRGXF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCCF is a Hold and SRGXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GSCCF: $0.09 vs. SRGXF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: GSCCF and SRGXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSCCF: 100% vs. SRGXF: 197%
Market capitalization -- GSCCF: $223.53M vs. SRGXF: $37.02M
GSCCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $223.53M. SRGXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $37.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSCCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSRGXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GSCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SRGXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRGXF is a better buy in the long-term than GSCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSCCF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRGXF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSCCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SRGXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSCCF is a better buy in the short-term than SRGXF.

Price Growth

GSCCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +13.93% price change this week, while SRGXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -17.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSCCF($224M) has a higher market cap than SRGXF($37M). SRGXF YTD gains are higher at: 42.975 vs. GSCCF (-11.614). SRGXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.14M vs. GSCCF (-9.53M). GSCCF has more cash in the bank: 21.6M vs. SRGXF (2.57M). SRGXF has less debt than GSCCF: SRGXF (58.8K) vs GSCCF (1.32M). GSCCF (0) and SRGXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GSCCFSRGXFGSCCF / SRGXF
Capitalization224M37M605%
EBITDA-9.53M-2.14M445%
Gain YTD-11.61442.975-27%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash21.6M2.57M840%
Total Debt1.32M58.8K2,245%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSCCF vs SRGXF: Fundamental Ratings
GSCCF
SRGXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10096
SMR RATING
1..100
9393
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5742
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SRGXF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSCCF (100). This means that SRGXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSCCF’s over the last 12 months.

SRGXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as GSCCF (100). This means that SRGXF’s stock grew similarly to GSCCF’s over the last 12 months.

SRGXF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as GSCCF (93). This means that SRGXF’s stock grew similarly to GSCCF’s over the last 12 months.

SRGXF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as GSCCF (57). This means that SRGXF’s stock grew similarly to GSCCF’s over the last 12 months.

GSCCF's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRGXF (100). This means that GSCCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRGXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSCCFSRGXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRGXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FHECX15.780.16
+1.05%
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate C
PAHWX8.220.06
+0.74%
PGIM Jennison Intl Sm-Md Cap Opps A
BGSRX70.250.45
+0.64%
BlackRock Technology Opportunities R
LMREX34.300.04
+0.12%
ClearBridge Mid Cap R
JFARX39.63N/A
N/A
JHancock Fundamental All Cap Core R4

GSCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSCCF and DAUGF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSCCF and DAUGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSCCF
1D Price
Change %
GSCCF100%
+21.28%
DAUGF - GSCCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTCDF - GSCCF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRRLF - GSCCF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRLVF - GSCCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+5.13%
SRGXF - GSCCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
More

SRGXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRGXF and IVPAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRGXF and IVPAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRGXF
1D Price
Change %
SRGXF100%
+1.22%
IVPAF - SRGXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
FRSPF - SRGXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-7.25%
AGXPF - SRGXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+12.07%
SMMYY - SRGXF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
FGOVF - SRGXF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.39%
More