Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSBUX vs HBLCX
GSBUX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts GSBUX vs HBLCX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder R6
Price$27.77
Change+$0.05 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.68B
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.50
Change+$0.07 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.64B
GSBUX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBUX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBUX is a Hold and HBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. GSBUX (2.68B). GSBUX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: GSBUX (4.27) vs HBLCX (2.55). GSBUX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: GSBUX (10 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than GSBUX (0.62). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. GSBUX (30.00). HBLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSBUX: HBLCX (2000) vs GSBUX (5000000). GSBUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.88 vs. HBLCX (7.26). GSBUX return over 5 years is better than : 29.65 vs. HBLCX (5.82).
| GSBUX | HBLCX | GSBUX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.64 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.64 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.276 | 1.683 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2000 | 250,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.68B | 11.6B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.27 | 2.55 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.88 | 7.26 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.29 | 12.51 | 234% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.65 | 5.82 | 509% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.35 | 42.24 | 240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers