Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSBIX vs HBLCX
GSBIX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts GSBIX vs HBLCX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder Instl
Price$27.42
Change+$0.05 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.75
Change+$0.07 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.94B
GSBIX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBIX vs. HBLCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBIX is a Buy and HBLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. GSBIX (2.65B). GSBIX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: GSBIX (4.25) vs HBLCX (2.58). GSBIX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: GSBIX (28 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than GSBIX (0.63). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. GSBIX (30.00). HBLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSBIX: HBLCX (2000) vs GSBIX (1000000). GSBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.61 vs. HBLCX (2.50). GSBIX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. HBLCX (11.86).
| GSBIX | HBLCX | GSBIX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.64 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.64 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.932 | 7.405 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 11.9B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.25 | 2.58 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.61 | 2.50 | 345% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.63 | 15.65 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.75 | 11.86 | 301% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.95 | 37.40 | 222% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement