GSBD
Price
$9.38
Change
+$0.19 (+2.07%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.07B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WHF
Price
$6.53
Change
-$0.01 (-0.15%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
151.38M
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSBD vs WHF

Header iconGSBD vs WHF Comparison
Open Charts GSBD vs WHFBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs BDC
Price$9.38
Change+$0.19 (+2.07%)
Volume$11.19K
Capitalization1.07B
WhiteHorse Finance
Price$6.53
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
Volume$149.79K
Capitalization151.38M
GSBD vs WHF Comparison Chart in %
GSBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSBD vs. WHF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBD is a Buy and WHF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (GSBD: $9.20 vs. WHF: $6.54)
Brand notoriety: GSBD and WHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSBD: 146% vs. WHF: 63%
Market capitalization -- GSBD: $1.07B vs. WHF: $151.38M
GSBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.07B. WHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $151.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $166.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSBD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GSBD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSBD is a better buy in the long-term than WHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSBD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSBD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GSBD and WHF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GSBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.02% price change this week, while WHF (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

GSBD is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

WHF is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.43% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSBD($1.07B) has a higher market cap than WHF($151M). WHF has higher P/E ratio than GSBD: WHF (15.15) vs GSBD (8.16). GSBD YTD gains are higher at: -0.862 vs. WHF (-5.899). WHF has less debt than GSBD: WHF (324M) vs GSBD (1.84B). GSBD has higher revenues than WHF: GSBD (147M) vs WHF (15.9M).
GSBDWHFGSBD / WHF
Capitalization1.07B151M709%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.862-5.89915%
P/E Ratio8.1615.1554%
Revenue147M15.9M925%
Total Cash115MN/A-
Total Debt1.84B324M569%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSBD vs WHF: Fundamental Ratings
GSBD
WHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
763
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
2876
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7476
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9685
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (7). This means that WHF’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

WHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (100). This means that WHF’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WHF (76). This means that GSBD’s stock grew somewhat faster than WHF’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's Price Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as WHF (76). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to WHF’s over the last 12 months.

WHF's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (96). This means that WHF’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSBDWHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WOLWF21.17N/A
N/A
Woolworths Group Limited
ZDPY0.40N/A
N/A
Zoned Properties, Inc.
YITYY1.35N/A
N/A
YIT OYJ
NNCHF34.10N/A
N/A
Nissan Chemical Corporation
NWINF0.95-0.01
-0.61%
Naked Wines PLC

GSBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBD has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBD jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBD
1D Price
Change %
GSBD100%
-0.65%
OBDC - GSBD
82%
Closely correlated
-3.48%
TSLX - GSBD
81%
Closely correlated
-2.57%
BXSL - GSBD
76%
Closely correlated
-2.43%
CGBD - GSBD
75%
Closely correlated
-2.48%
MFIC - GSBD
72%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
More

WHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHF has been loosely correlated with GSBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHF jumps, then GSBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHF
1D Price
Change %
WHF100%
-3.54%
GSBD - WHF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
BCSF - WHF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
TSLX - WHF
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.57%
CGBD - WHF
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
TPVG - WHF
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
More