GSBD
Price
$10.89
Change
-$0.02 (-0.18%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.24B
39 days until earnings call
SVVC
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
409.45K
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSBD vs SVVC

Header iconGSBD vs SVVC Comparison
Open Charts GSBD vs SVVCBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs BDC
Price$10.89
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
Volume$603.69K
Capitalization1.24B
Firsthand Technology Value Fund
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$202
Capitalization409.45K
GSBD vs SVVC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSBD vs. SVVC commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBD is a Buy and SVVC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GSBD: $10.89 vs. SVVC: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: GSBD and SVVC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSBD: 97% vs. SVVC: 3%
Market capitalization -- GSBD: $1.24B vs. SVVC: $409.45K
GSBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.24B. SVVC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $409.45K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSBD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSVVC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GSBD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SVVC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSBD is a better buy in the long-term than SVVC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSBD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVVC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SVVC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVVC is a better buy in the short-term than GSBD.

Price Growth

GSBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.03% price change this week, while SVVC (@Investment Managers) price change was +8.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

GSBD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSBD($1.24B) has a higher market cap than SVVC($409K). GSBD has higher P/E ratio than SVVC: GSBD (8.71) vs SVVC (0.47). GSBD YTD gains are higher at: -1.561 vs. SVVC (-3.571). GSBD has more cash in the bank: 82.8M vs. SVVC (2.64K). GSBD has higher revenues than SVVC: GSBD (161M) vs SVVC (849K).
GSBDSVVCGSBD / SVVC
Capitalization1.24B409K303,912%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.561-3.57144%
P/E Ratio8.710.471,854%
Revenue161M849K18,963%
Total Cash82.8M2.64K3,131,619%
Total Debt1.8BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSBD vs SVVC: Fundamental Ratings
GSBD
SVVC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63100
SMR RATING
1..100
2597
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7555
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9483
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a43

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSBD's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVVC (65). This means that GSBD’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVVC (100). This means that GSBD’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's SMR Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SVVC (97). This means that GSBD’s stock grew significantly faster than SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

SVVC's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (75). This means that SVVC’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

SVVC's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (94). This means that SVVC’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSBDSVVC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
51%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBR41.671.67
+4.17%
Nabors Industries Ltd
NAAS3.900.07
+1.83%
NaaS Technology Inc
WY24.540.37
+1.53%
Weyerhaeuser Company
SYNA69.590.22
+0.32%
Synaptics
QIPT2.68N/A
N/A
Quipt Home Medical Corp

GSBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBD has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBD jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBD
1D Price
Change %
GSBD100%
-0.18%
OBDC - GSBD
82%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
TSLX - GSBD
77%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
BXSL - GSBD
76%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
CGBD - GSBD
74%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
BCSF - GSBD
74%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
More

SVVC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVVC and GSBD have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVVC and GSBD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVVC
1D Price
Change %
SVVC100%
N/A
GSBD - SVVC
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
TPVG - SVVC
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
JHG - SVVC
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
HLNE - SVVC
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
TSLX - SVVC
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
More