GSBD
Price
$9.60
Change
+$0.04 (+0.42%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OCSL
Price
$12.70
Change
+$0.06 (+0.47%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSBD vs OCSL

Header iconGSBD vs OCSL Comparison
Open Charts GSBD vs OCSLBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs BDC
Price$9.60
Change+$0.04 (+0.42%)
Volume$968.38K
Capitalization1.1B
Oaktree Specialty Lending
Price$12.70
Change+$0.06 (+0.47%)
Volume$371.01K
Capitalization1.12B
GSBD vs OCSL Comparison Chart in %
GSBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OCSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSBD vs. OCSL commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBD is a Hold and OCSL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GSBD: $9.60 vs. OCSL: $12.70)
Brand notoriety: GSBD and OCSL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSBD: 78% vs. OCSL: 46%
Market capitalization -- GSBD: $1.1B vs. OCSL: $1.12B
GSBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.1B. OCSL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $168.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSBD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOCSL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GSBD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OCSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCSL is a better buy in the long-term than GSBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSBD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCSL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSBD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OCSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OCSL is a better buy in the short-term than GSBD.

Price Growth

GSBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.54% price change this week, while OCSL (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

GSBD is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

OCSL is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.89% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCSL($1.12B) and GSBD($1.1B) have the same market capitalization . OCSL has higher P/E ratio than GSBD: OCSL (32.56) vs GSBD (8.35). OCSL (-9.109) and GSBD (-9.166) have similar YTD gains . OCSL has less debt than GSBD: OCSL (1.49B) vs GSBD (1.84B). GSBD has higher revenues than OCSL: GSBD (147M) vs OCSL (25M).
GSBDOCSLGSBD / OCSL
Capitalization1.1B1.12B98%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-9.166-9.109101%
P/E Ratio8.3532.5626%
Revenue147M25M588%
Total Cash108MN/A-
Total Debt1.84B1.49B124%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSBD vs OCSL: Fundamental Ratings
GSBD
OCSL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6464
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10061
SMR RATING
1..100
2840
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7574
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9614
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCSL's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (9). This means that OCSL’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

OCSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSBD (100). This means that OCSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as OCSL (40). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to OCSL’s over the last 12 months.

OCSL's Price Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (75). This means that OCSL’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

OCSL's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GSBD (96). This means that OCSL’s stock grew significantly faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSBDOCSL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OCSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSZIX17.370.11
+0.64%
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Z
FNKIX16.590.05
+0.30%
Frank Value Instl
TSEMX17.030.03
+0.18%
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr Y
FAFSX37.67N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Financials M
TCGRX33.64-0.02
-0.06%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth R4

GSBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBD has been closely correlated with MFIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBD jumps, then MFIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBD
1D Price
Change %
GSBD100%
+0.42%
MFIC - GSBD
81%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
BCSF - GSBD
80%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
CSWC - GSBD
80%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
GBDC - GSBD
80%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
OBDC - GSBD
79%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
More

OCSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCSL has been closely correlated with GSBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OCSL jumps, then GSBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCSL
1D Price
Change %
OCSL100%
+0.47%
GSBD - OCSL
76%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
SLRC - OCSL
74%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
GBDC - OCSL
73%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
PFLT - OCSL
73%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
ARCC - OCSL
72%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
More