Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSBAX vs WCMNX
GSBAX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts GSBAX vs WCMNX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth C
Price$16.05
Change+$0.29 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets396.04M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.85
Change+$0.20 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
GSBAX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBAX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBAX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSBAX has more cash in the bank: 396M vs. WCMNX (44.4M). GSBAX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . GSBAX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: GSBAX (6 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). GSBAX (2.41) is less costly to investors than WCMNX (2.04). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GSBAX (69.00). GSBAX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GSBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.88 vs. WCMNX (-1.37). GSBAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.43 vs. WCMNX (0.74).
| GSBAX | WCMNX | GSBAX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.24 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.41 | 2.04 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.226 | 7.486 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 396M | 44.4M | 892% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.88 | -1.37 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.08 | 21.03 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.43 | 0.74 | 735% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement