Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSBAX vs WCMNX
GSBAX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts GSBAX vs WCMNX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth C
Price$16.48
Change+$0.77 (+4.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets404.19M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$14.42
Change+$0.82 (+6.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
GSBAX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBAX vs. WCMNX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBAX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSBAX has more cash in the bank: 404M vs. WCMNX (47.1M). GSBAX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . GSBAX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: GSBAX (6 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). GSBAX (2.15) is less costly to investors than WCMNX (2.04). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GSBAX (73.00). GSBAX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WCMNX (8.34) and GSBAX (8.14) have marching annual gain over last year. GSBAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.43 vs. WCMNX (-6.49).
| GSBAX | WCMNX | GSBAX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.24 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 2.04 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.975 | 6.421 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 404M | 47.1M | 858% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.14 | 8.34 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.85 | 18.68 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.43 | -6.49 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement