Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSBAX vs WCMLX
GSBAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts GSBAX vs WCMLX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth C
Price$16.05
Change+$0.29 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets396.04M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
GSBAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSBAX has more cash in the bank: 396M vs. WCMLX (44.4M). GSBAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . GSBAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: GSBAX (6 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). GSBAX (2.41) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GSBAX (69.00). GSBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: GSBAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). GSBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.88 vs. WCMLX (-1.14). GSBAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.43 vs. WCMLX (1.99).
| GSBAX | WCMLX | GSBAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.99 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.41 | 1.79 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.226 | 7.621 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 396M | 44.4M | 892% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.88 | -1.14 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.08 | 21.83 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.43 | 1.99 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement