Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAIX vs TRCLX
GSAIX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAIX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity Instl
Price$28.38
Change-$0.24 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.92M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.63
Change-$0.30 (-2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.84M
GSAIX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAIX vs. TRCLX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAIX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 61.8M vs. GSAIX (40.9M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAIX: TRCLX (1.34) vs GSAIX (1.14). GSAIX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAIX (30 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GSAIX (1.94). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAIX (70.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAIX: TRCLX (500000) vs GSAIX (1000000). GSAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.62 vs. TRCLX (27.19). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -3.01 vs. GSAIX (-26.34).
| GSAIX | TRCLX | GSAIX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.03 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.616 | 29.072 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.9M | 61.8M | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.34 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.62 | 27.19 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.29 | 32.10 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.34 | -3.01 | 877% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement