Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAIX vs TRCLX
GSAIX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAIX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity Instl
Price$29.34
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.01
Change+$0.14 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
GSAIX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAIX vs. TRCLX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAIX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.9M vs. GSAIX (42.4M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAIX: TRCLX (1.64) vs GSAIX (1.53). GSAIX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAIX (30 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GSAIX (1.94). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAIX (70.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAIX: TRCLX (500000) vs GSAIX (1000000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.20 vs. GSAIX (44.65). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.24 vs. GSAIX (-30.94).
| GSAIX | TRCLX | GSAIX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.03 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.616 | 5.088 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 66.9M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.64 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.65 | 47.20 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.16 | 22.07 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.94 | -7.24 | 428% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement