Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAIX vs MCDFX
GSAIX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAIX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity Instl
Price$29.34
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.21
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.9M
GSAIX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAIX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAIX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 92.9M vs. GSAIX (42.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAIX: MCDFX (4.05) vs GSAIX (1.53). GSAIX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAIX (30 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAIX (1.94) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAIX (70.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAIX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAIX (1000000). GSAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.65 vs. MCDFX (39.81). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -9.97 vs. GSAIX (-30.94).
| GSAIX | MCDFX | GSAIX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.616 | 3.823 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 92.9M | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 4.05 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.65 | 39.81 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.16 | 10.28 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.94 | -9.97 | 310% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.37 | 65.86 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement