Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAIX vs MCDFX
GSAIX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAIX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity Instl
Price$27.87
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.38M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
GSAIX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAIX vs. MCDFX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAIX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. GSAIX (40.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAIX: MCDFX (2.83) vs GSAIX (1.19). GSAIX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAIX (30 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAIX (1.94) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAIX (70.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAIX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAIX (1000000). GSAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.15 vs. MCDFX (26.20). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.82 vs. GSAIX (-28.46).
| GSAIX | MCDFX | GSAIX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.32 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.215 | 27.587 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4M | 97.7M | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 2.83 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.15 | 26.20 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.13 | 18.26 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.46 | -8.82 | 323% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.84 | 39.01 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement