Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAGX vs TRCLX
GSAGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAGX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$26.67
Change-$0.50 (-1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.18M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.57
Change+$1.40 (+9.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
GSAGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAGX vs. TRCLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAGX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.9M vs. GSAGX (42.2M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: TRCLX (1.49) vs GSAGX (1.27). GSAGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAGX (32 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (1.73). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. GSAGX (63.00). GSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSAGX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.04 vs. GSAGX (36.12). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -9.00 vs. GSAGX (-37.78).
| GSAGX | TRCLX | GSAGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.03 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 1.73 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.261 | 10.035 | 42% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2M | 66.9M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.49 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.12 | 50.04 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.18 | 28.71 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.78 | -9.00 | 420% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement