Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAGX vs TRCLX
GSAGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAGX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$25.91
Change-$0.22 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.51M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.01
Change-$0.09 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.21M
GSAGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAGX vs. TRCLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAGX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 62.2M vs. GSAGX (41.5M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: TRCLX (1.36) vs GSAGX (1.06). GSAGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAGX (31 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAGX (70.00). GSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSAGX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX (34.66) and GSAGX (34.23) have marching annual gain over last year. TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.07 vs. GSAGX (-31.55).
| GSAGX | TRCLX | GSAGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.03 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 2.10 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.384 | 33.523 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5M | 62.2M | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.36 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.23 | 34.66 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.82 | 25.24 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.55 | -5.07 | 622% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement