Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAGX vs MCDFX
GSAGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAGX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$25.87
Change+$0.20 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.7M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.87
Change+$0.11 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
GSAGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAGX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. GSAGX (40.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: MCDFX (2.83) vs GSAGX (1.06). GSAGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAGX (31 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAGX (70.00). GSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAGX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). GSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.93 vs. MCDFX (27.35). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.14 vs. GSAGX (-29.28).
| GSAGX | MCDFX | GSAGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.32 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 1.32 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.057 | 28.538 | 112% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.7M | 97.7M | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 2.83 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.93 | 27.35 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.99 | 16.44 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.28 | -8.14 | 360% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.88 | 40.04 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement