Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAGX vs MCDFX
GSAGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAGX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$26.43
Change+$0.15 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.63M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
GSAGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAGX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. GSAGX (41.6M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: MCDFX (2.84) vs GSAGX (1.05). GSAGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAGX (31 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAGX (70.00). GSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAGX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.91 vs. GSAGX (31.99). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.29 vs. GSAGX (-30.70).
| GSAGX | MCDFX | GSAGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.32 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 1.32 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.150 | 34.849 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.6M | 99.3M | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 2.84 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.99 | 35.91 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.54 | 36.33 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.70 | -2.29 | 1,338% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.28 | 43.39 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement