Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs TRCLX
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$27.98
Change+$0.22 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.7M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.23
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.47M
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. TRCLX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 62.5M vs. GSAFX (40.7M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: TRCLX (1.36) vs GSAFX (1.21). GSAFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAFX (8 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GSAFX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAFX (70.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: TRCLX (500000) vs GSAFX (5000000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.77 vs. GSAFX (30.20). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.47 vs. GSAFX (-27.87).
| GSAFX | TRCLX | GSAFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.293 | 34.280 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 500000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.7M | 62.5M | 65% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.36 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.20 | 33.77 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.08 | 28.39 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.87 | -6.47 | 431% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement