Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs TRCLX
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$28.86
Change-$0.55 (-1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.23M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.57
Change+$1.40 (+9.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. TRCLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.9M vs. GSAFX (42.2M). TRCLX (1.49) and GSAFX (1.45) have matching dividends . GSAFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAFX (8 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (1.73). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. GSAFX (63.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: TRCLX (500000) vs GSAFX (5000000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.04 vs. GSAFX (36.66). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -9.00 vs. GSAFX (-36.41).
| GSAFX | TRCLX | GSAFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.73 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.301 | 10.035 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 500000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2M | 66.9M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.49 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.66 | 50.04 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.46 | 28.71 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.41 | -9.00 | 404% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement