Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs TRCLX
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$28.62
Change+$0.16 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.63M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.55M
GSAFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. TRCLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Buy and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 63.5M vs. GSAFX (41.6M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: TRCLX (1.34) vs GSAFX (1.20). GSAFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAFX (8 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GSAFX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAFX (70.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: TRCLX (500000) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.47 vs. TRCLX (30.01). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.40 vs. GSAFX (-28.96).
| GSAFX | TRCLX | GSAFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.563 | 33.144 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 500000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.6M | 63.5M | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.34 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.47 | 30.01 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.97 | 33.50 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.96 | -6.40 | 453% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement