Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs MICHX
GSAFX vs MICHX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MICHX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$28.61
Change+$0.34 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.92M
Matthews China Small Companies Instl
Price$11.66
Change+$0.17 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.74M
GSAFX vs MICHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MICHX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Hold and MICHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICHX has more cash in the bank: 72.7M vs. GSAFX (40.9M). MICHX (1.19) and GSAFX (1.15) have matching dividends . GSAFX was incepted earlier than MICHX: GSAFX (8 years) vs MICHX (8 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MICHX (1.50). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. MICHX (54.39). MICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MICHX (100000) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.62 vs. MICHX (29.85). GSAFX return over 5 years is better than : -26.31 vs. MICHX (-41.98).
| GSAFX | MICHX | GSAFX / MICHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.20 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.50 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.664 | 26.821 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 100000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.9M | 72.7M | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.19 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.62 | 29.85 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.31 | 21.76 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.31 | -41.98 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement