Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs MICHX
GSAFX vs MICHX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MICHX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$28.86
Change-$0.55 (-1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.23M
Matthews China Small Companies Instl
Price$12.83
Change+$0.65 (+5.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.17M
GSAFX vs MICHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MICHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Hold and MICHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICHX has more cash in the bank: 72.2M vs. GSAFX (42.2M). MICHX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: MICHX (2.20) vs GSAFX (1.45). GSAFX was incepted earlier than MICHX: GSAFX (8 years) vs MICHX (8 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MICHX (1.50). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. MICHX (54.39). MICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MICHX (100000) vs GSAFX (5000000). MICHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.61 vs. GSAFX (36.66). GSAFX (-36.41) and MICHX (-36.41) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GSAFX | MICHX | GSAFX / MICHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.20 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.50 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.301 | 12.347 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 100000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2M | 72.2M | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 2.20 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.66 | 42.61 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.46 | 11.09 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.41 | -36.41 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement