Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs MCDFX
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$28.61
Change+$0.34 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.92M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.14
Change+$0.23 (+1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. GSAFX (40.9M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: MCDFX (2.78) vs GSAFX (1.15). GSAFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAFX (8 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAFX (70.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.62 vs. MCDFX (27.74). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.89 vs. GSAFX (-26.31).
| GSAFX | MCDFX | GSAFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.32 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.664 | 28.884 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.9M | 104M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 2.78 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.62 | 27.74 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.31 | 36.75 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.31 | -3.89 | 676% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement