Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs MCDFX
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$29.22
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.32M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.21
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.9M
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 92.9M vs. GSAFX (42.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: MCDFX (4.05) vs GSAFX (1.54). GSAFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAFX (8 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAFX (70.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.70 vs. MCDFX (39.81). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -9.97 vs. GSAFX (-30.92).
| GSAFX | MCDFX | GSAFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.32 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.602 | 3.823 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.3M | 92.9M | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 4.05 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.70 | 39.81 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.17 | 10.28 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.92 | -9.97 | 310% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement