Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs MCDFX
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$24.22
Change-$0.33 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.47M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.30
Change-$0.20 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. GSAFX (34.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: MCDFX (3.62) vs GSAFX (1.44). GSAFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAFX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAFX (70.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.50 vs. MCDFX (22.13). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.33 vs. GSAFX (-18.18).
| GSAFX | MCDFX | GSAFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.32 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.515 | 12.616 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5M | 93.9M | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 3.62 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.50 | 22.13 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.52 | 3.33 | -166% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.18 | -3.33 | 546% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 2.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement