Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs MCDFX
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$25.46
Change-$0.19 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.87M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.07
Change-$0.06 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a StrongBuy and MCDFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. GSAFX (36.9M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: MCDFX (3.26) vs GSAFX (1.38). GSAFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAFX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAFX (70.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAFX (5000000). MCDFX (40.17) and GSAFX (39.09) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -4.14 vs. GSAFX (-25.14).
| GSAFX | MCDFX | GSAFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.32 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.378 | 21.623 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.9M | 90.4M | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 3.26 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.09 | 40.17 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.53 | 10.53 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.14 | -4.14 | 607% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement