Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs MCDFX
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$28.62
Change+$0.16 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.63M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. GSAFX (41.6M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: MCDFX (2.84) vs GSAFX (1.20). GSAFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAFX (8 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAFX (70.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAFX (5000000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.91 vs. GSAFX (32.47). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.29 vs. GSAFX (-28.96).
| GSAFX | MCDFX | GSAFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.32 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.563 | 34.849 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.6M | 99.3M | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 2.84 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.47 | 35.91 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.97 | 36.33 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.96 | -2.29 | 1,262% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement