Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAFX vs MCDFX
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAFX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$27.92
Change-$0.15 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.8M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.08
Change-$0.12 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
GSAFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAFX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. GSAFX (40.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: MCDFX (2.83) vs GSAFX (1.21). GSAFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAFX (8 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAFX (70.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: MCDFX (2500) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX (34.80) and MCDFX (33.67) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.21 vs. GSAFX (-29.83).
| GSAFX | MCDFX | GSAFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.32 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.853 | 31.737 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8M | 97.7M | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 2.83 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.80 | 33.67 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.18 | 21.70 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.83 | -5.21 | 573% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement