Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAEX vs TRCLX
GSAEX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAEX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$28.78
Change-$0.55 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.23M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.57
Change+$1.40 (+9.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
GSAEX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAEX vs. TRCLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAEX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.9M vs. GSAEX (42.2M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAEX: TRCLX (1.49) vs GSAEX (1.40). GSAEX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAEX (12 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (1.73). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. GSAEX (63.00). GSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSAEX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.04 vs. GSAEX (36.52). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -9.00 vs. GSAEX (-36.70).
| GSAEX | TRCLX | GSAEX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.03 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.73 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.313 | 10.035 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2M | 66.9M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.49 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.52 | 50.04 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.11 | 28.71 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.70 | -9.00 | 408% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement