Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAEX vs TRCLX
GSAEX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSAEX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$28.54
Change+$0.17 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.63M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.55M
GSAEX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAEX vs. TRCLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAEX is a Buy and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 63.5M vs. GSAEX (41.6M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSAEX: TRCLX (1.34) vs GSAEX (1.15). GSAEX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSAEX (12 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) and GSAEX (2.05) have similar cost to investors . TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSAEX (70.00). GSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSAEX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). GSAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.37 vs. TRCLX (30.01). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.40 vs. GSAEX (-28.88).
| GSAEX | TRCLX | GSAEX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.03 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 2.10 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.197 | 33.144 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.6M | 63.5M | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.34 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.37 | 30.01 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.52 | 33.50 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.88 | -6.40 | 451% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement