Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAEX vs MCDFX
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAEX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$27.83
Change-$0.16 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.8M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.08
Change-$0.12 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAEX vs. MCDFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAEX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. GSAEX (40.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAEX: MCDFX (2.83) vs GSAEX (1.16). GSAEX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAEX (12 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAEX (70.00). GSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAEX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). GSAEX (34.60) and MCDFX (33.67) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.21 vs. GSAEX (-30.15).
| GSAEX | MCDFX | GSAEX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.32 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.32 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.681 | 31.737 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8M | 97.7M | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 2.83 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.60 | 33.67 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.84 | 21.70 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.15 | -5.21 | 579% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.05 | 38.53 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement