Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAEX vs MCDFX
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAEX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$28.54
Change+$0.17 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.63M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAEX vs. MCDFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAEX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. GSAEX (41.6M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAEX: MCDFX (2.84) vs GSAEX (1.15). GSAEX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAEX (12 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAEX (70.00). GSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAEX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.91 vs. GSAEX (32.34). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.29 vs. GSAEX (-29.30).
| GSAEX | MCDFX | GSAEX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.32 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.32 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.391 | 34.849 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.6M | 99.3M | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 2.84 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.34 | 35.91 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.53 | 36.33 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.30 | -2.29 | 1,277% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.36 | 43.39 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement