Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAEX vs MCDFX
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAEX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$27.60
Change+$0.20 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.06M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAEX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAEX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. GSAEX (39.1M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAEX: MCDFX (2.90) vs GSAEX (1.21). GSAEX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAEX (12 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAEX (70.00). GSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAEX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). GSAEX (50.85) and MCDFX (49.55) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.29 vs. GSAEX (-20.74).
| GSAEX | MCDFX | GSAEX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.32 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.32 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.744 | 28.884 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.1M | 99.4M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 2.90 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 50.85 | 49.55 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.18 | 22.86 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.74 | 1.29 | -1,610% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.46 | 45.98 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement