Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSAEX vs MCDFX
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSAEX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$24.45
Change-$0.02 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.93M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.13
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.33M
GSAEX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSAEX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSAEX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 88.3M vs. GSAEX (34.9M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSAEX: MCDFX (3.26) vs GSAEX (1.32). GSAEX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSAEX (11 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSAEX (70.00). GSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSAEX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). GSAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.65 vs. MCDFX (23.77). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.58 vs. GSAEX (-23.61).
| GSAEX | MCDFX | GSAEX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.32 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.32 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.822 | 13.498 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9M | 88.3M | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 3.26 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.65 | 23.77 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.99 | -1.98 | 605% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.61 | -8.58 | 275% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.91 | 14.34 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement