Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs TRCLX
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$22.98
Change-$0.47 (-2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.18M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.57
Change+$1.40 (+9.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSACX vs. TRCLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSACX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.9M vs. GSACX (42.2M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSACX: TRCLX (1.49) vs GSACX (1.24). GSACX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSACX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (1.73). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. GSACX (63.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSACX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.04 vs. GSACX (35.15). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -9.00 vs. GSACX (-40.60).
| GSACX | TRCLX | GSACX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.03 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 1.73 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.218 | 10.035 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2M | 66.9M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.49 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.15 | 50.04 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.64 | 28.71 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.60 | -9.00 | 451% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement