Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs TRCLX
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$22.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.38M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.18
Change+$0.06 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.47M
GSACX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSACX vs. TRCLX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSACX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 62.5M vs. GSACX (40.4M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GSACX: TRCLX (1.36) vs GSACX (0.25). GSACX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GSACX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GSACX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.77 vs. GSACX (27.99). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.47 vs. GSACX (-32.99).
| GSACX | TRCLX | GSACX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.03 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 2.10 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.100 | 34.280 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4M | 62.5M | 65% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.36 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.99 | 33.77 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.41 | 28.39 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.99 | -6.47 | 510% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement