Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs MCDFX
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$22.22
Change-$0.12 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.8M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.08
Change-$0.12 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSACX vs. MCDFX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSACX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. GSACX (40.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSACX: MCDFX (2.83) vs GSACX (0.25). GSACX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSACX (28 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSACX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX (31.60) and GSACX (31.07) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -6.94 vs. GSACX (-36.71).
| GSACX | MCDFX | GSACX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.32 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 1.32 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.629 | 30.354 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8M | 97.7M | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 2.83 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.07 | 31.60 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.44 | 20.42 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.71 | -6.94 | 529% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.21 | 37.07 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement