Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs MCDFX
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$22.53
Change-$0.19 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.92M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change-$0.10 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSACX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSACX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. GSACX (40.9M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSACX: MCDFX (2.78) vs GSACX (0.24). GSACX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSACX (28 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSACX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). GSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.12 vs. MCDFX (27.74). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.89 vs. GSACX (-31.84).
| GSACX | MCDFX | GSACX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.32 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 1.32 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.452 | 28.884 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.9M | 104M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 2.78 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.12 | 27.74 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.85 | 36.75 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.84 | -3.89 | 818% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.17 | 36.67 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement