Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSACX vs MCDFX
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GSACX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$22.80
Change+$0.13 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.63M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
GSACX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSACX vs. MCDFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSACX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. GSACX (41.6M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GSACX: MCDFX (2.84) vs GSACX (0.25). GSACX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GSACX (28 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GSACX (70.00). GSACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GSACX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.61 vs. GSACX (32.08). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.67 vs. GSACX (-33.89).
| GSACX | MCDFX | GSACX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.32 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 1.32 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.039 | 34.330 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.6M | 99.3M | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 2.84 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.08 | 35.61 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.52 | 35.27 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.89 | -2.67 | 1,269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.99 | 42.14 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement