GS
Price
$961.68
Change
-$14.18 (-1.45%)
Updated
Jan 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
292.69B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SCHW
Price
$103.82
Change
+$1.06 (+1.03%)
Updated
Jan 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
182.6B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GS vs SCHW

Header iconGS vs SCHW Comparison
Open Charts GS vs SCHWBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$961.68
Change-$14.18 (-1.45%)
Volume$19.33K
Capitalization292.69B
Charles Schwab Corp (The)
Price$103.82
Change+$1.06 (+1.03%)
Volume$51.18K
Capitalization182.6B
GS vs SCHW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GS vs. SCHW commentary
Jan 17, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Hold and SCHW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 17, 2026
Stock price -- (GS: $975.86 vs. SCHW: $102.76)
Brand notoriety: GS and SCHW are both notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GS: 175% vs. SCHW: 98%
Market capitalization -- GS: $292.69B vs. SCHW: $182.6B
GS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $292.69B. SCHW’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $182.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSCHW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SCHW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the long-term than SCHW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCHW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCHW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GS and SCHW are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +4.39% price change this week, while SCHW (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

GS is expected to report earnings on Apr 13, 2026.

SCHW is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.75% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($293B) has a higher market cap than SCHW($183B). SCHW has higher P/E ratio than GS: SCHW (24.07) vs GS (19.82). GS YTD gains are higher at: 11.019 vs. SCHW (2.853). SCHW has less debt than GS: SCHW (27.6B) vs GS (376B). GS has higher revenues than SCHW: GS (58.7B) vs SCHW (22.9B).
GSSCHWGS / SCHW
Capitalization293B183B160%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.0192.853386%
P/E Ratio19.8224.0782%
Revenue58.7B22.9B256%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt376B27.6B1,362%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS vs SCHW: Fundamental Ratings
GS
SCHW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8382
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
741
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
920
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2274
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCHW's Valuation (75) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (79). This means that SCHW’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCHW (41). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCHW’s over the last 12 months.

GS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SCHW (5). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to SCHW’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (9) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SCHW (20). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to SCHW’s over the last 12 months.

GS's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCHW (74). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCHW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSSCHW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCHW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XLY122.700.45
+0.37%
State Street® CnsmrDiscSelSectSPDR®ETF
XMAR40.03N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Mar
XAUG37.54N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Aug
CARY20.90-0.01
-0.05%
Angel Oak Income ETF
BLTD25.65-0.02
-0.08%
Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF

GS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GS
1D Price
Change %
GS100%
+4.63%
MS - GS
92%
Closely correlated
+5.78%
EVR - GS
84%
Closely correlated
+4.52%
SF - GS
82%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
PIPR - GS
81%
Closely correlated
+3.75%
JEF - GS
81%
Closely correlated
+2.82%
More

SCHW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHW has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHW jumps, then MS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHW
1D Price
Change %
SCHW100%
+0.82%
MS - SCHW
72%
Closely correlated
+5.78%
RJF - SCHW
72%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
LPLA - SCHW
69%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
SF - SCHW
69%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
GS - SCHW
69%
Closely correlated
+4.63%
More