GS
Price
$614.00
Change
+$8.12 (+1.34%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
134.2B
39 days until earnings call
PIPR
Price
$264.01
Change
+$7.01 (+2.73%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
2.98B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GS vs PIPR

Header iconGS vs PIPR Comparison
Open Charts GS vs PIPRBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$614.00
Change+$8.12 (+1.34%)
Volume$1.68M
Capitalization134.2B
Piper Sandler Companies
Price$264.01
Change+$7.01 (+2.73%)
Volume$93.33K
Capitalization2.98B
GS vs PIPR Comparison Chart
Loading...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GS vs. PIPR commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a StrongBuy and PIPR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GS: $608.44 vs. PIPR: $251.26)
Brand notoriety: GS: Notable vs. PIPR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GS: 71% vs. PIPR: 56%
Market capitalization -- GS: $134.2B vs. PIPR: $2.98B
GS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $134.2B. PIPR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePIPR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PIPR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the long-term than GS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIPR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PIPR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the short-term than GS.

Price Growth

GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.52% price change this week, while PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

GS is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

PIPR is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.82% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($134B) has a higher market cap than PIPR($2.98B). PIPR has higher P/E ratio than GS: PIPR (39.76) vs GS (18.08). GS YTD gains are higher at: 6.782 vs. PIPR (-15.139). PIPR has less debt than GS: PIPR (164M) vs GS (333B). GS has higher revenues than PIPR: GS (46.3B) vs PIPR (1.3B).
GSPIPRGS / PIPR
Capitalization134B2.98B4,504%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.782-15.139-45%
P/E Ratio18.0839.7645%
Revenue46.3B1.3B3,562%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt333B164M203,049%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS vs PIPR: Fundamental Ratings
GS
PIPR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1971
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1525
SMR RATING
1..100
544
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2356
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7690
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PIPR's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GS (97) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (25) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

GS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIPR (44) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (23) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIPR (56) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

GS's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (90) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSPIPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

GS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GS
1D Price
Change %
GS100%
-1.18%
EVR - GS
88%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
SF - GS
87%
Closely correlated
-1.12%
PIPR - GS
85%
Closely correlated
-1.99%
JEF - GS
84%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
MC - GS
83%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
More

PIPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIPR
1D Price
Change %
PIPR100%
-1.99%
EVR - PIPR
90%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
MC - PIPR
89%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
GS - PIPR
85%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
SF - PIPR
85%
Closely correlated
-1.12%
JEF - PIPR
85%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
More