GS
Price
$938.99
Change
+$159.03 (+20.39%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
281.63B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NMR
Price
$8.63
Change
+$1.48 (+20.70%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.6B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GS vs NMR

Header iconGS vs NMR Comparison
Open Charts GS vs NMRBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$938.99
Change+$159.03 (+20.39%)
Volume$2.32M
Capitalization281.63B
Nomura Holdings
Price$8.63
Change+$1.48 (+20.70%)
Volume$1.29M
Capitalization25.6B
GS vs NMR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GS vs. NMR commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Buy and NMR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (GS: $938.99 vs. NMR: $8.63)
Brand notoriety: GS: Notable vs. NMR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GS: 103% vs. NMR: 113%
Market capitalization -- GS: $281.63B vs. NMR: $25.6B
GS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $281.63B. NMR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $25.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileNMR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • NMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMR is a better buy in the long-term than GS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the short-term than NMR.

Price Growth

GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.00% price change this week, while NMR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -5.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

GS is expected to report earnings on Apr 13, 2026.

NMR is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.89% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($282B) has a higher market cap than NMR($25.6B). GS has higher P/E ratio than NMR: GS (18.30) vs NMR (11.36). GS YTD gains are higher at: 6.825 vs. NMR (2.861). GS has less debt than NMR: GS (376B) vs NMR (16.16T). NMR has higher revenues than GS: NMR (1.76T) vs GS (58.7B).
GSNMRGS / NMR
Capitalization282B25.6B1,102%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.8252.861239%
P/E Ratio18.3011.36161%
Revenue58.7B1.76T3%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt376B16.16T2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS vs NMR: Fundamental Ratings
GS
NMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7785
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1049
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3450
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMR's Valuation (15) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for GS (85). This means that NMR’s stock grew significantly faster than GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMR (49). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMR’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's SMR Rating (1) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (5). This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMR (45). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMR’s over the last 12 months.

GS's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NMR (50). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSNMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NMR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PYZ127.055.21
+4.27%
Invesco DW Basic Materials Momt ETF
IDMO58.590.24
+0.41%
Invesco S&P International Dev Momt ETF
URSP43.64-0.21
-0.48%
ProShares Ultra S&P 500 Equal Weight
TWN57.87-0.43
-0.74%
Taiwan Fund
EWV22.15-0.34
-1.51%
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan

GS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GS
1D Price
Change %
GS100%
-0.78%
MS - GS
92%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
SF - GS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
EVR - GS
84%
Closely correlated
-4.50%
HLI - GS
81%
Closely correlated
-2.32%
PIPR - GS
81%
Closely correlated
-3.13%
More

NMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMR has been loosely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMR jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMR
1D Price
Change %
NMR100%
+0.12%
GS - NMR
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
MS - NMR
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
DSEEY - NMR
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
SF - NMR
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
EVR - NMR
58%
Loosely correlated
-4.50%
More