GS
Price
$721.27
Change
+$1.53 (+0.21%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
218.34B
64 days until earnings call
NDAQ
Price
$96.85
Change
+$0.40 (+0.41%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
55.57B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GS vs NDAQ

Header iconGS vs NDAQ Comparison
Open Charts GS vs NDAQBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$721.27
Change+$1.53 (+0.21%)
Volume$1.28M
Capitalization218.34B
Nasdaq
Price$96.85
Change+$0.40 (+0.41%)
Volume$2.57M
Capitalization55.57B
GS vs NDAQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GS vs. NDAQ commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Hold and NDAQ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (GS: $721.27 vs. NDAQ: $96.85)
Brand notoriety: GS: Notable vs. NDAQ: Not notable
GS represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while NDAQ is part of the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GS: 60% vs. NDAQ: 74%
Market capitalization -- GS: $218.34B vs. NDAQ: $55.57B
GS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $218.34B. NDAQ’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $55.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $170.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.1B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the long-term than NDAQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the short-term than GS.

Price Growth

GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.69% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +5.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.08%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

GS is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2025.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+5.79% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Financial Publishing/Services (+1.82% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($218B) has a higher market cap than NDAQ($55.6B). NDAQ has higher P/E ratio than GS: NDAQ (37.25) vs GS (15.89). GS (27.215) and NDAQ (26.085) have similar YTD gains . NDAQ has less debt than GS: NDAQ (9.63B) vs GS (373B). GS has higher revenues than NDAQ: GS (56.2B) vs NDAQ (8.11B).
GSNDAQGS / NDAQ
Capitalization218B55.6B392%
EBITDAN/A2.83B-
Gain YTD27.21526.085104%
P/E Ratio15.8937.2543%
Revenue56.2B8.11B693%
Total CashN/A2.01B-
Total Debt373B9.63B3,873%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
GS
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1313
SMR RATING
1..100
559
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1310
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4959
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NDAQ's Valuation (67) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (96). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (13). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (59). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (13). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (59). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSNDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QVMS26.220.63
+2.46%
Invesco S&P SmallCp 600 QVM Mlt-fctr ETF
IQDG38.800.22
+0.57%
WisdomTree International Qual Div Gr ETF
XLY223.780.39
+0.17%
The Consumer Discret Sel SectSPDR® ETF
TDEC22.50N/A
N/A
FT Vest Emerging Mkts Buffr ETF - Dec
USL35.40-0.07
-0.21%
United States 12 Month Oil

GS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GS
1D Price
Change %
GS100%
+0.21%
EVR - GS
88%
Closely correlated
-0.71%
SF - GS
88%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
JEF - GS
86%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
PIPR - GS
86%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
MC - GS
82%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
More

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
+0.41%
MCO - NDAQ
77%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
MS - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
JEF - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
MORN - NDAQ
69%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
GS - NDAQ
69%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
More