GS
Price
$770.76
Change
-$16.02 (-2.04%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
238.01B
92 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
MS
Price
$155.34
Change
+$0.21 (+0.14%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
247.97B
Earnings call today
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GS vs MS

Header iconGS vs MS Comparison
Open Charts GS vs MSBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$770.76
Change-$16.02 (-2.04%)
Volume$4.71M
Capitalization238.01B
Morgan Stanley
Price$155.34
Change+$0.21 (+0.14%)
Volume$8.02M
Capitalization247.97B
GS vs MS Comparison Chart in %
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GS vs. MS commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Hold and MS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (GS: $770.76 vs. MS: $155.34)
Brand notoriety: GS and MS are both notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GS: 265% vs. MS: 155%
Market capitalization -- GS: $238.01B vs. MS: $247.97B
GS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $238.01B. MS’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $247.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the long-term than GS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GS and MS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.39% price change this week, while MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +97.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

GS is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2026.

MS is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.31% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($248B) and GS($238B) have the same market capitalization . MS has higher P/E ratio than GS: MS (17.59) vs GS (15.66). GS YTD gains are higher at: 36.672 vs. MS (26.251). MS has less debt than GS: MS (352B) vs GS (373B). MS has higher revenues than GS: MS (61.5B) vs GS (56.2B).
GSMSGS / MS
Capitalization238B248B96%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.67226.251140%
P/E Ratio15.6617.5989%
Revenue56.2B61.5B91%
Total CashN/A4.29B-
Total Debt373B352B106%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS vs MS: Fundamental Ratings
GS
MS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8281
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1112
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
812
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3549
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MS's Valuation (30) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GS (95). This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (12). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (5). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (12). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (49). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EOLS6.370.37
+6.17%
Evolus
JSPR2.510.11
+4.58%
Jasper Therapeutics
CTRI20.49-0.11
-0.53%
Centuri Holdings
EQX11.87-0.27
-2.22%
Equinox Gold Corp
MOBBW4.07-0.20
-4.69%
Mobilicom Limited

GS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GS
1D Price
Change %
GS100%
-2.04%
SF - GS
88%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
EVR - GS
88%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
JEF - GS
85%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
MC - GS
83%
Closely correlated
+2.92%
LAZ - GS
82%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
More

MS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MS has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MS jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MS
1D Price
Change %
MS100%
+0.14%
GS - MS
93%
Closely correlated
-2.04%
SF - MS
86%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
EVR - MS
86%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
JEF - MS
84%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
RJF - MS
82%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
More