GS
Price
$625.60
Change
-$16.66 (-2.59%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
134.2B
50 days until earnings call
LPLA
Price
$372.13
Change
-$7.33 (-1.93%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
19.67B
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GS vs LPLA

Header iconGS vs LPLA Comparison
Open Charts GS vs LPLABanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$625.60
Change-$16.66 (-2.59%)
Volume$3M
Capitalization134.2B
LPL Financial Holdings
Price$372.13
Change-$7.33 (-1.93%)
Volume$1.18M
Capitalization19.67B
GS vs LPLA Comparison Chart
Loading...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LPLA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GS vs. LPLA commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a StrongBuy and LPLA is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (GS: $672.19 vs. LPLA: $379.99)
Brand notoriety: GS: Notable vs. LPLA: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GS: 99% vs. LPLA: 118%
Market capitalization -- GS: $134.2B vs. LPLA: $19.67B
GS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $134.2B. LPLA’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $19.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLPLA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LPLA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, LPLA is a better buy in the long-term than GS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LPLA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LPLA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the short-term than LPLA.

Price Growth

GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +3.85% price change this week, while LPLA (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

GS is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2025.

LPLA is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.21% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($134B) has a higher market cap than LPLA($19.7B). LPLA has higher P/E ratio than GS: LPLA (19.46) vs GS (18.08). GS YTD gains are higher at: 17.388 vs. LPLA (16.379). LPLA has less debt than GS: LPLA (3.96B) vs GS (333B). GS has higher revenues than LPLA: GS (46.3B) vs LPLA (10.1B).
GSLPLAGS / LPLA
Capitalization134B19.7B680%
EBITDAN/A1.99B-
Gain YTD17.38816.379106%
P/E Ratio18.0819.4693%
Revenue46.3B10.1B458%
Total CashN/A466M-
Total Debt333B3.96B8,403%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS vs LPLA: Fundamental Ratings
GS
LPLA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7583
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
523
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
738
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5718
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LPLA's Valuation (88) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (96). This means that LPLA’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LPLA (7). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to LPLA’s over the last 12 months.

GS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LPLA (23). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to LPLA’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LPLA (38). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to LPLA’s over the last 12 months.

LPLA's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GS (57). This means that LPLA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSLPLA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LPLA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

GS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GS
1D Price
Change %
GS100%
+1.76%
SF - GS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
PIPR - GS
78%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
EVR - GS
75%
Closely correlated
+2.27%
MS - GS
75%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
MC - GS
72%
Closely correlated
+2.71%
More

LPLA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LPLA has been loosely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LPLA jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LPLA
1D Price
Change %
LPLA100%
+1.61%
RJF - LPLA
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
SF - LPLA
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
IBKR - LPLA
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
SCHW - LPLA
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
GS - LPLA
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
More