It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIBKR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBKR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.30% price change this week, while IBKR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.76%.
GS is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2025.
IBKR is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2025.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
GS | IBKR | GS / IBKR | |
Capitalization | 134B | 12B | 1,117% |
EBITDA | N/A | 6.6B | - |
Gain YTD | 56.988 | 116.549 | 49% |
P/E Ratio | 18.08 | 19.76 | 92% |
Revenue | 46.3B | 7.79B | 595% |
Total Cash | N/A | 3.75B | - |
Total Debt | 333B | 17M | 1,958,824% |
GS | IBKR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 35 | 22 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GS's Valuation (97) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as IBKR (100). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to IBKR’s over the last 12 months.
IBKR's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (6). This means that IBKR’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.
GS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IBKR (50). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than IBKR’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as IBKR (36). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to IBKR’s over the last 12 months.
IBKR's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GS (59). This means that IBKR’s stock grew somewhat faster than GS’s over the last 12 months.
GS | IBKR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago53% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago62% | 3 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago62% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago51% | 2 days ago64% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBKR has been loosely correlated with LPLA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IBKR jumps, then LPLA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBKR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IBKR | 100% | -0.50% | ||
LPLA - IBKR | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
SF - IBKR | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
PIPR - IBKR | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
RJF - IBKR | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
GS - IBKR | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More |