GRYCF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.59M
RDGMF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
14.09M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRYCF vs RDGMF

Header iconGRYCF vs RDGMF Comparison
Open Charts GRYCF vs RDGMFBanner chart's image
Graycliff Exploration
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.59M
RIDGELINE MINERALS
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$82.32K
Capitalization14.09M
GRYCF vs RDGMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRYCF vs. RDGMF commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRYCF is a Hold and RDGMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GRYCF: $0.02 vs. RDGMF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: GRYCF and RDGMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRYCF: 34% vs. RDGMF: 98%
Market capitalization -- GRYCF: $1.59M vs. RDGMF: $14.09M
GRYCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.59M. RDGMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $14.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRYCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRDGMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRYCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RDGMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GRYCF and RDGMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

GRYCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RDGMF (@Precious Metals) price change was -2.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDGMF($14.1M) has a higher market cap than GRYCF($1.59M). GRYCF YTD gains are higher at: 78.656 vs. RDGMF (41.263). RDGMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -941.15K vs. GRYCF (-1.78M). RDGMF has more cash in the bank: 416K vs. GRYCF (226K). RDGMF has less debt than GRYCF: RDGMF (74.7K) vs GRYCF (79.5K). GRYCF (0) and RDGMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GRYCFRDGMFGRYCF / RDGMF
Capitalization1.59M14.1M11%
EBITDA-1.78M-941.15K189%
Gain YTD78.65641.263191%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash226K416K54%
Total Debt79.5K74.7K106%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

GRYCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRYCF and KSKGF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRYCF and KSKGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRYCF
1D Price
Change %
GRYCF100%
N/A
KSKGF - GRYCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESGLF - GRYCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
THXPF - GRYCF
14%
Poorly correlated
-9.26%
AUGG - GRYCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.14%
RDGMF - GRYCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More

RDGMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDGMF and TORXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDGMF and TORXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDGMF
1D Price
Change %
RDGMF100%
-0.30%
TORXF - RDGMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
ISVLF - RDGMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+5.59%
WEXPF - RDGMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
RIOFF - RDGMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
OCGSF - RDGMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.11%
More