Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRSRX vs SWASX
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts GRSRX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty R
Price$56.01
Change+$0.27 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.94
Change+$0.03 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295M
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRSRX vs. SWASX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRSRX is a Hold and SWASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. SWASX (295M). SWASX pays higher dividends than GRSRX: SWASX (3.11) vs GRSRX (2.89). GRSRX was incepted earlier than SWASX: GRSRX (11 years) vs SWASX (19 years). GRSRX (1.34) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.72). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. GRSRX (67.00). GRSRX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.90 vs. GRSRX (14.75). SWASX (18.73) and GRSRX (18.51) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GRSRX | SWASX | GRSRX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.72 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.72 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.357 | 2.663 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 295M | 694% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 3.11 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.75 | 16.90 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.23 | 19.12 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.51 | 18.73 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.32 | 50.06 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement