Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRSRX vs SWASX
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts GRSRX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty R
Price$54.48
Change-$0.41 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.58
Change-$0.06 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets282.1M
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRSRX vs. SWASX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRSRX is a Buy and SWASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRSRX has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. SWASX (282M). SWASX pays higher dividends than GRSRX: SWASX (3.20) vs GRSRX (2.19). GRSRX was incepted earlier than SWASX: GRSRX (11 years) vs SWASX (18 years). GRSRX (1.34) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.71). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. GRSRX (67.00). GRSRX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.04 vs. GRSRX (9.41). GRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 27.50 vs. SWASX (18.42).
| GRSRX | SWASX | GRSRX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.71 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.71 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.489 | 5.955 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 282M | 707% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 3.20 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | 12.04 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.63 | 13.65 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.50 | 18.42 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.60 | 30.10 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement