Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRSRX vs SWASX
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts GRSRX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty R
Price$56.00
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets289.77M
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRSRX vs. SWASX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRSRX is a Hold and SWASX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. SWASX (290M). SWASX pays higher dividends than GRSRX: SWASX (3.11) vs GRSRX (2.22). GRSRX was incepted earlier than SWASX: GRSRX (11 years) vs SWASX (18 years). GRSRX (1.34) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.72). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. GRSRX (67.00). GRSRX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.24 vs. GRSRX (0.56). GRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 27.32 vs. SWASX (23.36).
| GRSRX | SWASX | GRSRX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.72 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.72 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.891 | 10.500 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 290M | 718% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.22 | 3.11 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.56 | 2.24 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.29 | 29.64 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.32 | 23.36 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.57 | 34.38 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement