Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRSRX vs SWASX
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts GRSRX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty R
Price$54.78
Change+$0.31 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.71
Change+$0.04 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets289.95M
GRSRX vs SWASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRSRX vs. SWASX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRSRX is a StrongBuy and SWASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRSRX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. SWASX (290M). SWASX pays higher dividends than GRSRX: SWASX (3.19) vs GRSRX (2.24). GRSRX was incepted earlier than SWASX: GRSRX (11 years) vs SWASX (18 years). GRSRX (1.34) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.72). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. GRSRX (67.00). GRSRX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.67 vs. GRSRX (0.88). GRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 25.20 vs. SWASX (20.78).
| GRSRX | SWASX | GRSRX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.72 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.72 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.544 | 10.239 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 290M | 683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 3.19 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.88 | 3.67 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.62 | 14.78 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.20 | 20.78 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.23 | 46.05 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement