GRSLF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
50.62M
NGXXF
Price
$15.98
Change
+$0.68 (+4.44%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.29B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRSLF vs NGXXF

Header iconGRSLF vs NGXXF Comparison
Open Charts GRSLF vs NGXXFBanner chart's image
GR SILVER MNG
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$698.52K
Capitalization50.62M
NGEx Minerals
Price$15.98
Change+$0.68 (+4.44%)
Volume$65.15K
Capitalization3.29B
GRSLF vs NGXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NGXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRSLF vs. NGXXF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRSLF is a StrongBuy and NGXXF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GRSLF: $0.14 vs. NGXXF: $15.98)
Brand notoriety: GRSLF and NGXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRSLF: 129% vs. NGXXF: 215%
Market capitalization -- GRSLF: $50.62M vs. NGXXF: $3.29B
GRSLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $50.62M. NGXXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $3.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRSLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNGXXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GRSLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NGXXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRSLF is a better buy in the long-term than NGXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRSLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NGXXF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRSLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NGXXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GRSLF and NGXXF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GRSLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +10.85% price change this week, while NGXXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NGXXF($3.3B) has a higher market cap than GRSLF($50.6M). NGXXF YTD gains are higher at: 70.936 vs. GRSLF (30.909). GRSLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -9.13M vs. NGXXF (-92.67M). NGXXF has more cash in the bank: 143M vs. GRSLF (1.72M). GRSLF (0) and NGXXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GRSLFNGXXFGRSLF / NGXXF
Capitalization50.6M3.3B2%
EBITDA-9.13M-92.67M10%
Gain YTD30.90970.93644%
P/E Ratio2.84N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.72M143M1%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRSLF: Fundamental Ratings
GRSLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
9
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRSLFNGXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NGXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLBEX37.880.20
+0.53%
American Funds American Balanced 529E
ADCIX25.400.01
+0.04%
American Century Disciplined Growth I
LSGGX24.60N/A
N/A
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Y
PARWX57.84-0.16
-0.28%
Parnassus Value Equity Investor
GGCIX133.23-0.55
-0.41%
Gabelli Growth I

GRSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRSLF has been loosely correlated with AGXPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRSLF jumps, then AGXPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRSLF
1D Price
Change %
GRSLF100%
+6.67%
AGXPF - GRSLF
44%
Loosely correlated
+12.07%
AAGFF - GRSLF
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.55%
AZMCF - GRSLF
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.96%
GLNCY - GRSLF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
GMBXF - GRSLF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
More

NGXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NGXXF and IVPAF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NGXXF and IVPAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NGXXF
1D Price
Change %
NGXXF100%
+4.49%
IVPAF - NGXXF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
BDNNY - NGXXF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
GRSLF - NGXXF
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.67%
FMCXF - NGXXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
GEODF - NGXXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.84%
More