Advertisement
GRRMF vs SAFLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRRMF is a Buy and SAFLF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GRRMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GRRMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SAFLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GRRMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GRRMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 0 bearish.
- SAFLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GRRMF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SAFLF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +6.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.37%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-1.57% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| GRRMF | SAFLF | GRRMF / SAFLF | |
| Capitalization | 1.75B | 710M | 246% |
| EBITDA | 422M | 107M | 394% |
| Gain YTD | -26.294 | 63.215 | -42% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.15 | 12.28 | 197% |
| Revenue | 2.19B | 999M | 219% |
| Total Cash | 203M | 72.6M | 280% |
| Total Debt | 2.21B | 115M | 1,918% |
GRRMF | SAFLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 72 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 32 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GRRMF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as SAFLF (64). This means that GRRMF’s stock grew similarly to SAFLF’s over the last 12 months.
SAFLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as GRRMF (100). This means that SAFLF’s stock grew similarly to GRRMF’s over the last 12 months.
SAFLF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as GRRMF (87). This means that SAFLF’s stock grew similarly to GRRMF’s over the last 12 months.
SAFLF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRRMF (88). This means that SAFLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRRMF’s over the last 12 months.
GRRMF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFLF (100). This means that GRRMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFLF’s over the last 12 months.
| GRRMF | SAFLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 20% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 42% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 27% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 23% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 30% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 27% |
Advertisement
GRRMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GRRMF and SAFLF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRRMF and SAFLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRRMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRRMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SAFLF - GRRMF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CYDX - GRRMF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IDTA - GRRMF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GNNDY - GRRMF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
| GTHP - GRRMF | 3% Poorly correlated | +8.53% | ||
More | ||||
SAFLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SAFLF and ICCM have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAFLF and ICCM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAFLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ICCM - SAFLF | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| MDXH - SAFLF | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.67% | ||
| XAIR - SAFLF | 25% Poorly correlated | -6.06% | ||
| GRRMF - SAFLF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AMBBY - SAFLF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.93% | ||
More | ||||