Advertisement
GRRMF vs ICCM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRRMF is a Hold and ICCM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GRRMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileICCM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GRRMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ICCM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ICCM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ICCM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GRRMF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ICCM (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -3.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.99%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
ICCM is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-2.27% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.78% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| GRRMF | ICCM | GRRMF / ICCM | |
| Capitalization | 1.04B | 42.1M | 2,461% |
| EBITDA | 422M | -15.1M | -2,795% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -0.016 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 65.16 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.19B | 2.98M | 73,546% |
| Total Cash | 203M | 10M | 2,030% |
| Total Debt | 2.21B | 288K | 765,972% |
GRRMF | ICCM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ICCM's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as GRRMF (68). This means that ICCM’s stock grew similarly to GRRMF’s over the last 12 months.
ICCM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GRRMF (100). This means that ICCM’s stock grew similarly to GRRMF’s over the last 12 months.
GRRMF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as ICCM (99). This means that GRRMF’s stock grew similarly to ICCM’s over the last 12 months.
GRRMF's Price Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as ICCM (82). This means that GRRMF’s stock grew similarly to ICCM’s over the last 12 months.
GRRMF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ICCM (100). This means that GRRMF’s stock grew significantly faster than ICCM’s over the last 12 months.
| GRRMF | ICCM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 29% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 27% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
Advertisement
GRRMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GRRMF and SAFLF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRRMF and SAFLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRRMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRRMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SAFLF - GRRMF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GTHP - GRRMF | 6% Poorly correlated | +7.10% | ||
| GNGBY - GRRMF | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.14% | ||
| ICCM - GRRMF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
| FZMD - GRRMF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
ICCM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICCM has been closely correlated with SINT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICCM jumps, then SINT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICCM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICCM | 100% | -1.04% | ||
| SINT - ICCM | 67% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| AMBFF - ICCM | 45% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BSX - ICCM | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| ILMN - ICCM | 31% Poorly correlated | -4.04% | ||
| PEN - ICCM | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
More | ||||