Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRPZ vs SCHA
GRPZ vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts GRPZ vs SCHA
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF
Price$28.48
Change+$1.77 (+6.63%)
Volume$421
Net Assets2.86M
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$30.45
Change+$2.41 (+8.59%)
Volume$3.45M
Net Assets20.48B
GRPZ vs SCHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRPZ vs. SCHA commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRPZ is a Hold and SCHA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 20.5B vs. GRPZ (2.86M). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than GRPZ: SCHA (6.917) vs GRPZ (3.653). GRPZ was incepted earlier than SCHA: GRPZ (2 years) vs SCHA (16 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than GRPZ (0.35). GRPZ has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| GRPZ | SCHA | GRPZ / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | 3.653 | 6.917 | 53% |
| Net Assets | 2.86M | 20.5B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.04 | 875% |
| Turnover | 81.00 | 11.00 | 736% |
| Yield | 0.92 | 1.19 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GRPZ | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 72% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GRPZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRPZ has been loosely correlated with CRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRPZ jumps, then CRK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRPZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRPZ | 100% | +1.11% | ||
| CRK - GRPZ | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| FELE - GRPZ | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| IOSP - GRPZ | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
| OTTR - GRPZ | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.92% | ||
| CPRX - GRPZ | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.56% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.87% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
More | ||||