Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRPM vs SCHA
GRPM vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts GRPM vs SCHA
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF
Price$122.55
Change+$1.44 (+1.19%)
Volume$100
Net Assets518.92M
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$30.10
Change-$0.35 (-1.15%)
Volume$3.74K
Net Assets20.48B
GRPM vs SCHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRPM vs. SCHA commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRPM is a Hold and SCHA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 20.5B vs. GRPM (519M). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than GRPM: SCHA (6.917) vs GRPM (0.917). GRPM was incepted earlier than SCHA: GRPM (15 years) vs SCHA (16 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than GRPM (0.35). GRPM has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| GRPM | SCHA | GRPM / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | 0.917 | 6.917 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 519M | 20.5B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.04 | 875% |
| Turnover | 70.00 | 11.00 | 636% |
| Yield | 1.17 | 1.19 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GRPM | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 10 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GRPM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRPM has been closely correlated with HWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GRPM jumps, then HWC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRPM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRPM | 100% | -1.28% | ||
| HWC - GRPM | 78% Closely correlated | +3.15% | ||
| TEX - GRPM | 78% Closely correlated | +7.09% | ||
| EWBC - GRPM | 78% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| WAL - GRPM | 77% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| LECO - GRPM | 75% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.56% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.87% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
More | ||||