GROW
Price
$2.42
Change
-$0.01 (-0.41%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
31.81M
WT
Price
$13.43
Change
-$0.31 (-2.26%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.98B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GROW vs WT

Header iconGROW vs WT Comparison
Open Charts GROW vs WTBanner chart's image
US Global Investors
Price$2.42
Change-$0.01 (-0.41%)
Volume$4.98K
Capitalization31.81M
WisdomTree
Price$13.43
Change-$0.31 (-2.26%)
Volume$4.9M
Capitalization1.98B
GROW vs WT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GROW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GROW vs. WT commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GROW is a StrongBuy and WT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GROW: $2.42 vs. WT: $13.43)
Brand notoriety: GROW: Not notable vs. WT: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GROW: 20% vs. WT: 140%
Market capitalization -- GROW: $31.81M vs. WT: $1.98B
GROW [@Investment Managers] is valued at $31.81M. WT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GROW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GROW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WT is a better buy in the long-term than GROW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GROW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GROW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • WT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WT is a better buy in the short-term than GROW.

Price Growth

GROW (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.62% price change this week, while WT (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

WT is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WT($1.98B) has a higher market cap than GROW($31.8M). GROW has higher P/E ratio than WT: GROW (242.00) vs WT (32.76). WT YTD gains are higher at: 28.990 vs. GROW (1.786). GROW has less debt than WT: GROW (17K) vs WT (515M).
GROWWTGROW / WT
Capitalization31.8M1.98B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.78628.9906%
P/E Ratio242.0032.76739%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A106M-
Total Debt17K515M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GROW vs WT: Fundamental Ratings
GROW
WT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7789
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10019
SMR RATING
1..100
9259
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
113
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GROW's Valuation (19) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as WT (33). This means that GROW’s stock grew similarly to WT’s over the last 12 months.

WT's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for GROW (100). This means that WT’s stock grew significantly faster than GROW’s over the last 12 months.

WT's SMR Rating (59) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GROW (92). This means that WT’s stock grew somewhat faster than GROW’s over the last 12 months.

WT's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as GROW (55). This means that WT’s stock grew similarly to GROW’s over the last 12 months.

GROW's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as WT (13). This means that GROW’s stock grew similarly to WT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GROWWT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GROW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITRM0.680.05
+7.31%
Iterum Therapeutics plc
RELX47.050.25
+0.53%
Relx PLC
GRC43.220.02
+0.05%
Gorman-Rupp Company (The)
CHH116.83-0.29
-0.25%
Choice Hotels Intnl
MFIN10.71-0.08
-0.74%
Medallion Financial Corp

GROW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GROW has been loosely correlated with EQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GROW jumps, then EQH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GROW
1D Price
Change %
GROW100%
-0.62%
EQH - GROW
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
CRBG - GROW
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
WT - GROW
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
JHG - GROW
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
OWL - GROW
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
More

WT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WT has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WT jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WT
1D Price
Change %
WT100%
-2.26%
JHG - WT
70%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
KKR - WT
68%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
AMP - WT
66%
Closely correlated
-4.42%
EQH - WT
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
CG - WT
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
More