GROW
Price
$2.49
Change
+$0.01 (+0.40%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
31.72M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OWL
Price
$16.05
Change
+$0.40 (+2.55%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.41B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GROW vs OWL

Header iconGROW vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts GROW vs OWLBanner chart's image
US Global Investors
Price$2.49
Change+$0.01 (+0.40%)
Volume$100
Capitalization31.72M
Blue Owl Capital
Price$16.05
Change+$0.40 (+2.55%)
Volume$240.28K
Capitalization10.41B
GROW vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
GROW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GROW vs. OWL commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GROW is a StrongBuy and OWL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (GROW: $2.48 vs. OWL: $15.66)
Brand notoriety: GROW and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GROW: 49% vs. OWL: 104%
Market capitalization -- GROW: $31.72M vs. OWL: $10.41B
GROW [@Investment Managers] is valued at $31.72M. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $10.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $167.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GROW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GROW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GROW is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GROW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GROW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the short-term than GROW.

Price Growth

GROW (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.40% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was +6.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

OWL is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.65% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($10.4B) has a higher market cap than GROW($31.7M). OWL has higher P/E ratio than GROW: OWL (195.75) vs GROW (35.43). GROW YTD gains are higher at: 5.267 vs. OWL (-29.590). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 780M vs. GROW (-200K). GROW has less debt than OWL: GROW (83K) vs OWL (3.65B). OWL has higher revenues than GROW: OWL (2.75B) vs GROW (8.45M).
GROWOWLGROW / OWL
Capitalization31.7M10.4B0%
EBITDA-200K780M-0%
Gain YTD5.267-29.590-18%
P/E Ratio35.43195.7518%
Revenue8.45M2.75B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt83K3.65B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GROW: Fundamental Ratings
GROW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
72
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GROWOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GROW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPU66.031.36
+2.10%
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
IGRO81.500.17
+0.21%
iShares International Dividend Gr ETF
TUSB50.430.02
+0.04%
Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF
SCEC25.460.01
+0.04%
Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF
EMCR36.54-0.07
-0.20%
Xtrackers EM CarbReduc&ClimtImprvs ETF

GROW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GROW has been loosely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GROW jumps, then APO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GROW
1D Price
Change %
GROW100%
+1.22%
APO - GROW
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
STT - GROW
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
WT - GROW
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.38%
OWL - GROW
34%
Loosely correlated
+5.03%
EQH - GROW
33%
Loosely correlated
+2.72%
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+5.03%
ARES - OWL
87%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
KKR - OWL
85%
Closely correlated
+3.10%
APO - OWL
82%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
CG - OWL
81%
Closely correlated
+3.24%
TPG - OWL
81%
Closely correlated
+4.01%
More