GRO
Price
$2.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
106.73M
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
USLIF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
645.73K
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRO vs USLIF

Header iconGRO vs USLIF Comparison
Open Charts GRO vs USLIFBanner chart's image
Brazil Potash
Price$2.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$201.79K
Capitalization106.73M
AMERICAN SALARS LITHIUM
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50
Capitalization645.73K
GRO vs USLIF Comparison Chart in %
GRO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USLIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRO vs. USLIF commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRO is a Buy and USLIF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GRO: $2.00 vs. USLIF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: GRO and USLIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRO: 28% vs. USLIF: 100%
Market capitalization -- GRO: $106.73M vs. USLIF: $645.73K
GRO [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $106.73M. USLIF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $645.73K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSLIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GRO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USLIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GRO and USLIF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USLIF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • USLIF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USLIF is a better buy in the short-term than GRO.

Price Growth

GRO (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while USLIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +61.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

GRO is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.42% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRO($107M) has a higher market cap than USLIF($646K). GRO YTD gains are higher at: -74.026 vs. USLIF (-81.263). USLIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.39M vs. GRO (-66.43M). GRO (0) and USLIF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GROUSLIFGRO / USLIF
Capitalization107M646K16,563%
EBITDA-66.43M-2.39M2,776%
Gain YTD-74.026-81.26391%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash9.34MN/A-
Total Debt655KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GROUSLIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USLIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.530.15
+0.70%
GameStop Corp
AAPL273.811.45
+0.53%
Apple
SPY690.382.42
+0.35%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA485.40-0.16
-0.03%
Tesla
BTC.X87234.740000-377.218750
-0.43%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

GRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRO and ALM have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRO and ALM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRO
1D Price
Change %
GRO100%
N/A
ALM - GRO
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
SLI - GRO
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.80%
LAC - GRO
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.50%
GSM - GRO
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
TECK - GRO
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.77%
More

USLIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USLIF and ALM have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USLIF and ALM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USLIF
1D Price
Change %
USLIF100%
N/A
ALM - USLIF
15%
Poorly correlated
+6.79%
NVA - USLIF
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.60%
GRO - USLIF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.91%
USAR - USLIF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+2.98%
NEXM - USLIF
-10%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%