GRNT
Price
$5.26
Change
-$0.07 (-1.31%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
690.36M
PR
Price
$13.44
Change
-$0.14 (-1.03%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
9.44B
86 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRNT vs PR

Header iconGRNT vs PR Comparison
Open Charts GRNT vs PRBanner chart's image
Granite Ridge Resources
Price$5.26
Change-$0.07 (-1.31%)
Volume$569.29K
Capitalization690.36M
Permian Resources
Price$13.44
Change-$0.14 (-1.03%)
Volume$10.71M
Capitalization9.44B
GRNT vs PR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRNT vs. PR commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRNT is a Hold and PR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (GRNT: $5.26 vs. PR: $13.44)
Brand notoriety: GRNT and PR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRNT: 79% vs. PR: 92%
Market capitalization -- GRNT: $690.36M vs. PR: $9.44B
GRNT [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $690.36M. PR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $9.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $119.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRNT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GRNT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PR is a better buy in the long-term than GRNT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRNT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRNT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRNT is a better buy in the short-term than PR.

Price Growth

GRNT (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +0.57% price change this week, while PR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +1.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

PR is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.17% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PR($9.45B) has a higher market cap than GRNT($690M). GRNT has higher P/E ratio than PR: GRNT (21.04) vs PR (8.62). PR YTD gains are higher at: -4.538 vs. GRNT (-15.447). GRNT has more cash in the bank: 37.9M vs. PR (138K). GRNT has less debt than PR: GRNT (250M) vs PR (4.15B).
GRNTPRGRNT / PR
Capitalization690M9.45B7%
EBITDA221MN/A-
Gain YTD-15.447-4.538340%
P/E Ratio21.048.62244%
Revenue414MN/A-
Total Cash37.9M138K27,464%
Total Debt250M4.15B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PR: Fundamental Ratings
PR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23
SMR RATING
1..100
56
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRNTPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVOX3.210.18
+5.94%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NVO ETF
DWCR32.95N/A
N/A
Arrow DWA Country Rotation ETF
XHYT34.77N/A
N/A
BondBloxx US HY Telecm Md Tech Sctr ETF
QVML38.03-0.08
-0.21%
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
VFMV129.38-0.39
-0.30%
Vanguard US Minimum Volatility ETF

GRNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRNT has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GRNT jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRNT
1D Price
Change %
GRNT100%
-1.31%
MTDR - GRNT
73%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
MGY - GRNT
73%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
OVV - GRNT
72%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
PR - GRNT
71%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
NOG - GRNT
71%
Closely correlated
-1.93%
More

PR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PR has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PR jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PR
1D Price
Change %
PR100%
-1.03%
MTDR - PR
93%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
CHRD - PR
91%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
OVV - PR
90%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
SM - PR
90%
Closely correlated
-2.02%
FANG - PR
89%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
More