GRLVF
Price
$0.24
Change
+$0.01 (+4.35%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
62.48M
TIGCF
Price
$0.24
Change
+$0.01 (+4.17%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.7M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRLVF vs TIGCF

Header iconGRLVF vs TIGCF Comparison
Open Charts GRLVF vs TIGCFBanner chart's image
Group Eleven Resources
Price$0.24
Change+$0.01 (+4.35%)
Volume$92.58K
Capitalization62.48M
Triumph Gold
Price$0.24
Change+$0.01 (+4.17%)
Volume$41.22K
Capitalization12.7M
GRLVF vs TIGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRLVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRLVF vs. TIGCF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRLVF is a StrongBuy and TIGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GRLVF: $0.24 vs. TIGCF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: GRLVF and TIGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRLVF: 48% vs. TIGCF: 27%
Market capitalization -- GRLVF: $62.48M vs. TIGCF: $12.7M
GRLVF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $62.48M. TIGCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $12.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRLVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTIGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRLVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TIGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRLVF is a better buy in the long-term than TIGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRLVF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TIGCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRLVF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TIGCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRLVF is a better buy in the short-term than TIGCF.

Price Growth

GRLVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.83% price change this week, while TIGCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRLVF($62.5M) has a higher market cap than TIGCF($12.7M). GRLVF YTD gains are higher at: 95.509 vs. TIGCF (53.125). TIGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -917.29K vs. GRLVF (-4.05M). GRLVF has more cash in the bank: 3.12M vs. TIGCF (960K). GRLVF (0) and TIGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GRLVFTIGCFGRLVF / TIGCF
Capitalization62.5M12.7M492%
EBITDA-4.05M-917.29K441%
Gain YTD95.50953.125180%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.12M960K325%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRLVF vs TIGCF: Fundamental Ratings
GRLVF
TIGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26100
SMR RATING
1..100
9896
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TIGCF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as GRLVF (62). This means that TIGCF’s stock grew similarly to GRLVF’s over the last 12 months.

GRLVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TIGCF (100). This means that GRLVF’s stock grew significantly faster than TIGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TIGCF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as GRLVF (98). This means that TIGCF’s stock grew similarly to GRLVF’s over the last 12 months.

TIGCF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GRLVF (41). This means that TIGCF’s stock grew similarly to GRLVF’s over the last 12 months.

TIGCF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GRLVF (100). This means that TIGCF’s stock grew similarly to GRLVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRLVFTIGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRLVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARSSF0.67N/A
N/A
Assura Plc
DWIS0.11N/A
N/A
Dinewise, Inc.
GRPTF19.28N/A
N/A
Getlink SE
FRFFF18.17-0.07
-0.37%
Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd.
OMZNF0.29-0.02
-4.97%
Osisko Metals Inc.

GRLVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRLVF and ELMTF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRLVF and ELMTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRLVF
1D Price
Change %
GRLVF100%
+5.13%
ELMTF - GRLVF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIGCF - GRLVF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.47%
SRGXF - GRLVF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
HANNF - GRLVF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.78%
GSCCF - GRLVF
7%
Poorly correlated
+21.28%
More

TIGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TIGCF and FRSPF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TIGCF and FRSPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TIGCF
1D Price
Change %
TIGCF100%
+2.47%
FRSPF - TIGCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.25%
GRLVF - TIGCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.13%
SYAAF - TIGCF
18%
Poorly correlated
-3.61%
TKRFF - TIGCF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
TLGRF - TIGCF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
More