GRLVF
Price
$0.31
Change
+$0.01 (+3.33%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
10.56M
SRGXF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
18.35M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRLVF vs SRGXF

Header iconGRLVF vs SRGXF Comparison
Open Charts GRLVF vs SRGXFBanner chart's image
Group Eleven Resources
Price$0.31
Change+$0.01 (+3.33%)
Volume$82.85K
Capitalization10.56M
Surge Copper
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$602.7K
Capitalization18.35M
GRLVF vs SRGXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRLVF vs. SRGXF commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRLVF is a Hold and SRGXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (GRLVF: $0.31 vs. SRGXF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: GRLVF and SRGXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRLVF: 51% vs. SRGXF: 440%
Market capitalization -- GRLVF: $10.56M vs. SRGXF: $18.35M
GRLVF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $10.56M. SRGXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $18.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRLVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSRGXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRLVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SRGXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRLVF is a better buy in the long-term than SRGXF.

Price Growth

GRLVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +19.56% price change this week, while SRGXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +8.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.32% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRGXF($18.3M) has a higher market cap than GRLVF($10.6M). GRLVF YTD gains are higher at: 145.068 vs. SRGXF (26.750). SRGXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 367K vs. GRLVF (-2.7M). GRLVF has more cash in the bank: 605K vs. SRGXF (76.8K). GRLVF has less debt than SRGXF: GRLVF (40K) vs SRGXF (110K). GRLVF (0) and SRGXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GRLVFSRGXFGRLVF / SRGXF
Capitalization10.6M18.3M58%
EBITDA-2.7M367K-737%
Gain YTD145.06826.750542%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash605K76.8K788%
Total Debt40K110K36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRLVF vs SRGXF: Fundamental Ratings
GRLVF
SRGXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1086
SMR RATING
1..100
9791
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3438
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SRGXF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as GRLVF (65). This means that SRGXF’s stock grew similarly to GRLVF’s over the last 12 months.

GRLVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SRGXF (86). This means that GRLVF’s stock grew significantly faster than SRGXF’s over the last 12 months.

SRGXF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as GRLVF (97). This means that SRGXF’s stock grew similarly to GRLVF’s over the last 12 months.

GRLVF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SRGXF (38). This means that GRLVF’s stock grew similarly to SRGXF’s over the last 12 months.

GRLVF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SRGXF (100). This means that GRLVF’s stock grew similarly to SRGXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADT8.11-0.12
-1.46%
ADT
WT10.06-0.18
-1.76%
WisdomTree
DEO105.29-2.02
-1.88%
Diageo plc
FAT2.56-0.09
-3.40%
FAT Brands
NRDY1.59-0.10
-5.92%
Nerdy

GRLVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRLVF and ELMTF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRLVF and ELMTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRLVF
1D Price
Change %
GRLVF100%
+3.42%
ELMTF - GRLVF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIGCF - GRLVF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRGXF - GRLVF
12%
Poorly correlated
+12.67%
HANNF - GRLVF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
GSCCF - GRLVF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.37%
More

SRGXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRGXF and MARIF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRGXF and MARIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRGXF
1D Price
Change %
SRGXF100%
+12.67%
MARIF - SRGXF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSCCF - SRGXF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.46%
IVPAF - SRGXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
FRSPF - SRGXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+13.92%
AGXPF - SRGXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
More